| 23 Nov 2025 |
 piegames | If you can tackle fixing that that would be appreciated | 09:30:50 |
 helle (just a stray cat girl) | okay, will tag you on the patch as I need to make sure to word it right | 09:35:37 |
| 24 Nov 2025 |
|  Aijokey joined the room. | 10:19:50 |
| piegames | Redacted or Malformed Event | 12:40:40 |
| piegames | Very small nit: Can we change the text "Not run" in the Gerrit Checks tab to "Queued"? Because I consistently read "Not run" as "Skipped" and get really confused | 12:56:10 |
| piegames | Or maybe "Not run yet" | 12:56:16 |
 Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | and if possible show them at the top too as queued instead of not showing them, because at first glance the only thing one sees is a bunch of green checkmarks, with no indication of queued tests, and one is confused why there's no +1 Verified (yet) | 13:08:25 |
| helle (just a stray cat girl) | yeah, so that is a plugin I have half done, someone needs to sit me down and make me actually finish a thing at the moment | 13:08:57 |
| helle (just a stray cat girl) | I can dig up the earlier conversation at some point and should make it an issue or idk move it to zulip, anyway | 13:09:31 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | zulip and/or issue sounds sensible | 13:10:22 |
| piegames | Hm, do we want a Zulip channel for Gerrit? | 15:04:18 |
 raitobezarius | Infra maybe | 15:19:44 |
| piegames | Uhm raitobezarius | 22:47:25 |
| piegames | I appreciate you submitting these changes but they were not fully ready yet | 22:47:37 |
| raitobezarius | Yes? | 22:47:40 |
| piegames | lacking release notes for example | 22:47:44 |
| piegames | and more tests | 22:47:50 |
| piegames | (my bad for not marking them as draft) | 22:48:02 |
| raitobezarius | Apologies for that, I was in a "submit routine" because too many changes are sent | 22:48:12 |
| piegames | oh and also they were awaiting a flaker run :D | 22:48:24 |
| raitobezarius | Next time, I won't touch your changes unless you give me an explicit request | 22:49:13 |
| piegames | if not for the Flaker run I'd go with a fixup commit, but given that I currently don't even know if Nixpkgs still evaluates with them (probably?) I think a revert might be preferable | 22:49:36 |
| raitobezarius | Do you think it's that time sensitive? | 22:50:02 |
| piegames | I have no clue | 22:50:10 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | What happens when one pushes to a already merged cl? /cur | 22:50:13 |
| raitobezarius | I can send a revert if you think so, but I'd imagine that we can be optimistic here | 22:50:15 |
| piegames | but also on my way to bed now so I won't do anything anymore | 22:50:22 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Do you think it's that time sensitive? Flaker is currently broken for unknown reasons | 22:50:25 |
| piegames | maybe ask horrors for a second opinion? | 22:50:34 |
| raitobezarius | Then, I believe that being optimistic about it is not too bad? | 22:50:37 |
