| 12 Dec 2024 |
 aloisw | (Technically this is apparently not even the thing called sandbox fallback in the codebase, sorry. But maybe it should be.) | 06:44:16 |
 aria (she/it) | hello, i made this change which got reverted a while back and was planning on doing it better but things got in the way. would it be better to change the git handling code to not use the hash classes (since they're basically opaque identifiers in that case), or to move the warnings/rejections up that code path? | 13:07:43 |
 K900 | I think the former | 13:08:24 |
 9999years | $ /nix/store/izafn6fir7cnpi49svgpdi49fh2cszna-nix-2.24.10/bin/nix-hash /tmp/test
warning: unknown experimental feature 'repl-flake'
warning: unknown setting 'repl-overlays'
error: path '/tmp' is a symlink
$ /nix/store/jiv1c44hyszgms8ikxcjcn3j084hn6a0-lix-2.91.1/bin/nix-hash /tmp/test
dbe35227fd596019bace4c5d38d1be23
| 23:13:10 |
| 9999years | another lix dub | 23:13:12 |
| 9999years | wait wtf | 23:14:03 |
| 9999years | when did they remove all nix versions below 2.24 from nixpkgs | 23:14:19 |
| 9999years | with the exception of 2.3 | 23:14:23 |
| 9999years | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/359215#issuecomment-2515965863 | 23:19:41 |
| 9999years | this is nuts | 23:19:45 |
 just1602 | What is nixos and / or nixpkgs policy regarding other nix implementation then nixcpp? Like to they care at all about other implementation and work with them? | 23:29:02 |
| 13 Dec 2024 |
| 9999years | fixing nix-prefetch-git by swapping nix for lix
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/364757 | 00:00:15 |
 Charles | github is HTTP 500'ing on that link for me lol | 00:02:07 |
| Charles | ah there it goes | 00:02:17 |
 raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | i don't think there's any precise policy | 00:12:15 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | though Eelco Dolstra was very vocal about NixOS being NixOS and not LixOS apparently | 00:12:30 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | Not sure if it matters though | 00:12:56 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | i'd suppose that any default implementation modification would require a RFC and SC involvement to some extent | 00:14:15 |
 Yureka (she/her) | LixOS 🥺 | 00:14:31 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | i'd buy it | 00:14:37 |
 Pyrox [It/She/They] | licks your OS | 00:20:56 |
 ToxicFrog | LixOS, the delicious distro | 04:23:16 |
 ma27 | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
though Eelco Dolstra was very vocal about NixOS being NixOS and not LixOS apparently given this was probably his only recent contribution to NixOS and DetSys insists on him not being involved much in nixpkgs, I question the relevance of that nowadays. | 07:40:43 |
 KFears (annoying) | I do as well, but he does behave as if it's relevant. But I guess this is a pattern both with him and generally with people | 10:05:14 |
| aloisw | In reply to @ma27:nicht-so.sexy
given this was probably his only recent contribution to NixOS and DetSys insists on him not being involved much in nixpkgs, I question the relevance of that nowadays. IIRC the statement even was before the LixOS incident. | 10:35:50 |
| 14 Dec 2024 |
 piegames | https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/2309 9999years I have a present for you :) | 11:01:59 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | Buildbot was upgraded to 4.1.0, please let me know if you notice anything wrong | 14:30:57 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | * Buildbot was upgraded to 4.1.0 (prev version: 4.0.1), please let me know if you notice anything wrong | 14:31:30 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | jade_ i looked into Gerrit dashboards for the Lix instance | 14:54:28 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | The problem is, as we are not doing source builds, we need binaries or to build plugins against the right API version | 14:54:40 |
