| 9 Nov 2025 |
 aloisw | I think https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/commit/80654b84b610f4c0622dd10f0af78a8a2ce97048 is the offending change btw. Currently building that and its parent to confirm. | 18:01:20 |
 Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | Worth mentioning on https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4556. But the cat is out of the bag on this and compat with cppnix wasn't a design decision for that patch? | 18:01:28 |
| aloisw | In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.de
I think https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/commit/80654b84b610f4c0622dd10f0af78a8a2ce97048 is the offending change btw. Currently building that and its parent to confirm. It's not, weirdly enough I get true there? | 18:06:22 |
| aloisw | Ah fuck I forgot to change f back to a function. | 18:10:03 |
| aloisw | Confirmed this is the breaking change. | 18:12:25 |
 raitobezarius | https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4556 | 18:16:23 |
| raitobezarius | not totally | 18:16:49 |
| raitobezarius | we looked hard and we were not able to disprove our theory that we were enabling more correctness | 18:17:03 |
| raitobezarius | like we ran evaluation regression testing and we had no failure but new successes | 18:17:22 |
| raitobezarius | after looking hard at the new success, we were unable to say "ah it's wrong", but more like: ah it's possibly a fun eq ptr bug | 18:17:44 |
