| 21 Sep 2025 |
raitobezarius | go for it | 17:05:36 |
raitobezarius | but double check for 1.2.0 and the patch | 17:05:41 |
K900 | Double checking yes | 17:07:07 |
K900 | I'm actually unvendoring it entirely | 17:07:18 |
K900 | Because nixpkgs is fine now | 17:07:21 |
K900 | https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4211 | 17:33:15 |
raitobezarius | K900: well i guess you missed the patch | 17:47:01 |
raitobezarius | because #2359 doesn't seem in capnp ? | 17:47:10 |
raitobezarius | ah i didn't make it clear which patch i was talking about | 17:47:34 |
K900 | 2369 was not in our vendor either | 17:47:36 |
K900 | The two patches we ACTUALLY had are both in 1.2.0 | 17:48:02 |
raitobezarius | right | 17:48:15 |
raitobezarius | this didn't surface because we have a hack prior to this patch | 17:48:24 |
aloisw | In reply to @k900:0upti.me The two patches we ACTUALLY had are both in 1.2.0 Last time I checked I thought the nodiscard one was not. And given that it's only useful for development what would be more relevant for the full unvendoring is that it's not in 1.1.0. | 18:53:56 |
K900 | Both PR merge commits show up as in 1.2.0 | 18:56:50 |
K900 | On my end | 18:56:53 |
| vczf joined the room. | 23:31:38 |