| 8 Sep 2025 |
 @aloisw:julia0815.de | Ok 2.93 was a flake, it is verified now. | 15:29:11 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | The CI unblock stacks are now finished (modulo nix-copy flakes) and review requested from people I believe to have sufficient permission on all branches. | 19:08:22 |
 emily | does anyone have any idea why functional-shell is so flaky | 19:21:17 |
| emily | I'm consistently failing to build it on my branch on Linux to the point where I'm starting to question whether I somehow broke it | 19:21:31 |
| 9 Sep 2025 |
 raitobezarius | I know why functional-repl is like this | 12:37:39 |
| raitobezarius | But I cannot remember why functional-shell | 12:37:44 |
| raitobezarius | In general, I feel like the source of flakiness is sleep as a sync-mutex primitive? | 12:37:58 |
| emily | it was indeed broken by a change I made. specifically when the change is present in both host and guest Nix | 14:58:55 |
|  aciceri changed their display name from zrsk to aciceri. | 15:01:01 |
| raitobezarius | lovely | 16:13:44 |
