!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

443 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.147 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
30 May 2024
@me:linj.techlinj joined the room.06:47:19
@aprl:uwu.isaprl changed their display name from aprl to aprl (GPN; DECT 2774; SIP GAYS).09:21:22
@polygon:catgirl.cloudpolygon system (it/she/they) changed their display name from polygon system (she/it/they) to polygon system (she/it/they) [DECT 7659].09:31:36
@thubrecht:matrix.orgthubrecht joined the room.09:46:21
@thubrecht:matrix.orgthubrechtHi, I'm back from breaking the CI, I redid the primops CLs, and I pushed the code in sb/tom-hubrecht/primops.cc-v209:47:27
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27 https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/1343?tab=checks+doesn%27t+seem doesn't seem to have any checks added. Am I doing something wrong or can I trigger those somewhere? 11:52:00
@k900:0upti.meK900Sign in to buildbot11:52:38
@k900:0upti.meK900It's fetching the data on the client for some reason 11:52:50
@aloisw:kde.orgaloisw It also doesn't have the "verified", so it seems it actually didn't build. 12:14:35
@delroth:delroth.netdelroth
In reply to @ma27:nicht-so.sexy
https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/1343?tab=checks+doesn%27t+seem doesn't seem to have any checks added. Am I doing something wrong or can I trigger those somewhere?
I think the buildbot queue had to be emptied yesterday evening and this was maybe collateral damage
12:32:05
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothsomeone can maybe retrigger CI - I don't have perms to do so :)12:32:27
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI'm trying to take care of it13:52:02
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut Internet is really bad13:52:05
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusok14:05:16
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi just did a dumb thing14:05:18
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi edited the commit message14:05:21
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusok let's go14:05:49
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusrestarted14:05:56
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuslet me know if there's any build cancelled you care about14:06:02
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothalso lost the code-review: +2 in the process though14:06:26
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthanks, it came back14:06:59
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi didn't find an easy way to look up a buildbot id number from the CL number14:07:47
@jade_:matrix.orgjade_https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/1356 there's another 20% off the build time20:58:03
@jade_:matrix.orgjade_real deep discount on build times as of late20:58:37
@jade_:matrix.orgjade_i think that if we managed to move all the json stuff into one staticlib or something then unity-built it, we could probably save about 40% of build time. like. i see about 400s on-cpu instantiating nlohmann stuff, but it may be that those are not actually additive and it's actually 200s. either way. our json parsing is expensive21:10:44
@jade_:matrix.orgjade_image.png
Download image.png
21:13:05
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriad
In reply to@delroth:delroth.net
someone can maybe retrigger CI - I don't have perms to do so :)
you're supposed to
23:13:17
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadlemme fix that23:13:28
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadyou may have to log out and log back in, but you should have those permissions now23:14:30
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriad
In reply to@jade_:matrix.org
i think that if we managed to move all the json stuff into one staticlib or something then unity-built it, we could probably save about 40% of build time. like. i see about 400s on-cpu instantiating nlohmann stuff, but it may be that those are not actually additive and it's actually 200s. either way. our json parsing is expensive
we could also switch away from nlohmann and probably gain some runtime JSON performance too
23:14:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10