| 27 Nov 2023 |
 vcunat | I don't see these buttons on this repo. | 08:09:21 |
| vcunat | Just "This repository is empty." | 08:09:40 |
 @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Let me add something so see whether it unlocks it | 08:10:13 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | I've just added a README, let me know whether that helps | 08:11:21 |
| vcunat | Yes, great. | 08:13:26 |
| vcunat | It's weird. Issues-only repos seem still useful to me, for watching and starring. | 08:14:03 |
| vcunat | But a README is a good thing anyway. | 08:14:25 |
| vcunat | TL;DR: resolved now. | 08:14:37 |
| 28 Nov 2023 |
|  @ryantm:matrix.org left the room. | 05:10:22 |
|  @phaer:matrix.org left the room. | 09:58:14 |
| 1 Dec 2023 |
|  Yuki (they/them) joined the room. | 09:51:46 |
| 2 Dec 2023 |
|  @bb010g:matrix.org left the room. | 13:15:42 |
| 4 Dec 2023 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Hey all,
We're having our second meeting scheduled this Friday, but it was mentioned that it could be good to vary the time slot to accommodate more people. Next best time in the original poll was Wednesday 4pm CET. Let's make a quick poll until the end of today to see whether we keep the current slot (Friday, 9pm cet) or switch to Wednesday. Whoever is coming, react with 1️⃣ if you prefer keeping Friday and 2️⃣ for moving it to Wednesday. | 10:39:36 |
 fricklerhandwerk | This wednesday? | 15:04:54 |
| fricklerhandwerk | * This wednesday? Absolute date? | 15:05:01 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Ergh sorry, I forgot to precise. Yes, this Wednesday (2023-12-06) | 15:20:25 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | * Hey all,
We're having our second meeting scheduled this Friday, but it was mentioned that it could be good to vary the time slot to accommodate more people. Next best time in the original poll was Wednesday 4pm CET. Let's make a quick poll until the end of today to see whether we keep the current slot (Friday, 9pm cet) or switch to Wednesday. Whoever is coming, react with 1️⃣ if you prefer keeping Friday and 2️⃣ for moving it to Wednesday (2023-12-06). | 15:20:39 |
| 5 Dec 2023 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | In reply to @theophane:hufschmitt.net
Hey all,
We're having our second meeting scheduled this Friday, but it was mentioned that it could be good to vary the time slot to accommodate more people. Next best time in the original poll was Wednesday 4pm CET. Let's make a quick poll until the end of today to see whether we keep the current slot (Friday, 9pm cet) or switch to Wednesday. Whoever is coming, react with 1️⃣ if you prefer keeping Friday and 2️⃣ for moving it to Wednesday (2023-12-06). Given the (small) results of the poll, let's keep it for Friday Dec. 8 21:00 CST.
Can each time find some representative to attend and note that in https://pad.lassul.us/nzIzJ-sVRay17ZOIr1qldA ? Thanks 🙂
| 15:56:32 |
 kpark955 | if you hear some background noise i am at a cafe! | 16:01:43 |
| 7 Dec 2023 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | In reply to @theophane:hufschmitt.net
Given the (small) results of the poll, let's keep it for Friday Dec. 8 21:00 CST.
Can each time find some representative to attend and note that in https://pad.lassul.us/nzIzJ-sVRay17ZOIr1qldA ? Thanks 🙂
Up 🔼
Who's planning on attending?
| 19:55:16 |
| 8 Dec 2023 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | In reply to @theophane:hufschmitt.net
Up 🔼
Who's planning on attending?
Given the broad lack of response (and me being a bit sick), I'll just cancel it. tomberek we'll find another occasion for a coffee 😛 | 15:03:38 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Let's plan for another gathering right now: https://lettucemeet.com/l/oel7O . Since Christmas is coming, it'll be hard to do it before next year, so I've scheduled that for the week of Jan 8 | 15:04:40 |
| 10 Dec 2023 |
 raitobezarius | Original discussion: https://matrix.to/#/!CJXQiUGqNPcFonEdME:nixos.org/$hBVZb-GTvVO0m3OYkZs49AZkNtwt6EU-d36yad9AD3g?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=in.tum.de
Continuation of https://matrix.to/#/!CJXQiUGqNPcFonEdME:nixos.org/$lrWwDhdMexWOE6r0EUDDInCZnQseWdc5bZ-IssiEBGI?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=in.tum.de
| 20:54:43 |
|  joepie91 🏳️🌈 joined the room. | 20:55:25 |
| raitobezarius | joepie91 🏳️🌈: so to answer to | 20:56:25 |
| raitobezarius |
I find it difficult to build a full mental picture in an ad-hoc conversation like this, and aside from it not really being on-topic for this room, it seems like trying to discuss this in such an ad-hoc manner here is not going to be a good thing for the energy levels of anyone involved. this is why I suggested clarifying it fully in an RFC that describes the full rationale - it gives the space and time to evaluate the rationale, and address specific points in a system that's more conducive to this sort of discussion
| 20:56:26 |
| raitobezarius | I will not do an RFC over this because I have spent a lot of cycles on all of that already and I believe that an RFC would make more sense as a part of a generalized problem around what is the mutual understanding of what does that mean to be a maintainer in nixpkgs | 20:56:55 |
| raitobezarius | Like, expectations, etc. | 20:56:58 |
| raitobezarius | Nonetheless, I don't honestly believe it will make go away the fundamental problem you are hinting at on the heavy reliance on GitHub as a contribution platform | 20:57:23 |
| raitobezarius | There's no RFC on that because it was performed before the RFC process | 20:57:32 |
