| 31 Oct 2023 |
 @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Nice, thanks 🙂
Can you invite the new members? I'll give them the necessary rights | 14:50:41 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Hey all,
Given the results of the poll, the best time slot is Fri Nov 10 at 21:00 CET (20:00 UTC). I've just sent an invite to all the chosen representatives. Let me know if you don't get it | 14:55:04 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | It's also in the NixOS.org agenda at https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=b9o52fobqjak8oq8lfkhg3t0qg%40group.calendar.google.com, although I don't know how to directly link to the event 🤷♂️ | 14:59:49 |
 raitobezarius | Théophane: I think it's important to note that grahamc (he/him) has been unactive in the security team AFAIK (please correct me if I'm saying something wrong), may I recommend @risicle or hexa (who is probably too busy?) instead? | 15:57:45 |
| raitobezarius | (unactive as I don't think I have seen any security-related activity in the past year) | 15:58:22 |
 hexa | yes, currently no capacity sadly | 15:58:38 |
| hexa | but risicle is a good choice if he has time | 15:58:51 |
| raitobezarius invited  risicle (Robert Scott). | 15:59:01 |
| hexa | graham isn't really active on matrix anymore | 15:59:06 |
| hexa | also not doing working on nixpkgs security | 15:59:17 |
| raitobezarius | risicle (Robert Scott): Would you have time to be active as the representative of the security team in the meetings we mention above? | 15:59:21 |
| raitobezarius | I am not even sure he would show up to such a meeting alas, hence my suggestion of proposing someone else | 15:59:59 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Théophane: I think it's important to note that grahamc (he/him) has been unactive in the security team AFAIK (please correct me if I'm saying something wrong), may I recommend @risicle or hexa (who is probably too busy?) instead? Certainly! I was quite sad not hearing anything from the docs team. risicle (Robert Scott) didn't join the room, what's the best way of contacting him? | 16:00:00 |
| raitobezarius | ah it's a gitter account | 16:00:12 |
| raitobezarius | omg | 16:00:13 |
| raitobezarius | how does that even work | 16:00:17 |
| hexa | he was only just invited | 16:00:21 |
| raitobezarius | We would ping him anyway in the security room worst case | 16:00:39 |
| hexa | @r_i_s:matrix.org | 16:00:40 |
| raitobezarius | thanks | 16:00:44 |
| raitobezarius invited  ris_. | 16:00:50 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Oh, I didn't notice that was a gitter account. Probably not the right one ideed then | 16:00:53 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
risicle (Robert Scott): Would you have time to be active as the representative of the security team in the meetings we mention above? ris_: ^ | 16:01:00 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | gitter was bought by Element and it's just a Matrix frontend now | 16:01:23 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @theophane:hufschmitt.net
Certainly! I was quite sad not hearing anything from the docs team. risicle (Robert Scott) didn't join the room, what's the best way of contacting him? Doc team would probably well represented by Valentin but he's probably very busy too | 16:01:25 |
| raitobezarius | We can ask Valentin to name someone else | 16:01:34 |
| raitobezarius | right :D | 16:01:48 |
| raitobezarius | I was just confused what kind of reactions should we expect in practice | 16:01:56 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
We can ask Valentin to name someone else I think Valentin told me he would come. But I'll have to double-check | 16:05:36 |
| raitobezarius | then I don't understand what do you mean by "quite sad not hearing anything from the docs team" | 16:05:53 |
