| 18 Aug 2025 |
 emily | how many people are truly using a graphics debugger | 17:15:11 |
| emily | I mean not that I don't think it's cool and worth keeping working but it doesn't exactly seem mass market | 17:15:26 |
 K900 | Why does renderdoc need qwe to begin with | 17:15:29 |
| emily | it doesn't | 17:15:33 |
| emily | it needs pyside2 | 17:15:34 |
| K900 | Then just yeet qwe from pyside2 | 17:15:44 |
| emily | yes that's what I'm saying | 17:15:50 |
| emily | what we should probably do is add a flag | 17:15:57 |
| K900 | I bet the only user of that is qutebrowser-qt5 which we can also yeet now that amjoseph self-immolated | 17:15:57 |
| emily | for backportability | 17:15:59 |
| emily | i.e. pyside2 grows withWebEngine ? true,, we set it to false for all known users that don't seem to obviously want a browser engine, then that's backportable | 17:16:28 |
| emily | then on unstable we swap it to false or delete the argument | 17:16:36 |
| K900 | I guess we could | 17:18:02 |
| emily | i mean mostly it seems bad to break WebEngine in pyside2 on stable | 17:25:24 |
| emily | and there are only a handful of users anyway | 17:25:37 |
| emily | withPySide2 = plotpy.override {
pyqt6 = pyside2;
qt6 = qt5;
};
| 17:26:57 |
| K900 | The FUCK | 17:27:33 |
| emily | it's in a "known failing tests" passthru | 17:28:11 |
| emily | but lol | 17:28:12 |
| emily | Grimmauld (any/all): (have we successfully sniped you into doing the marking btw) | 17:28:30 |
 aloisw | They have at least three, Konqueror still exists. | 17:52:14 |
| emily | I thought Konqueror was kinda dead. | 17:54:57 |
| emily | like not really maintained. | 17:55:00 |
| emily | is it on Qt 6? | 17:55:03 |
| K900 | Barely | 17:55:31 |
| aloisw | It runs at least. | 17:56:05 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
Grimmauld (any/all): (have we successfully sniped you into doing the marking btw) Okay fine, but you do the merge then, and I want an approve from k900 too. I am happy to play the bad guy breaking peoples packages, but it better have some active people backing me there :)
Is pyside fixed, or am I doing that too now? | 20:32:51 |
| K900 | I can do the thing but either much later or tomorrow | 20:33:55 |
| emily | I don't care about being the bad guy, I just have too many in-flight branches :P | 20:37:09 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | Fair enough. I'll poke tomorrow evening if I have to do pyside too. Without pyside, drafting probably won't take too long (though I'll have to look through stuff like release-small.nix too - it did contain stuff that pulled libsoup2, and I wouldn't be surprised if qtwebengine was in there too) | 20:39:03 |
