| 9 Aug 2025 |
K900 | * Problem is I might be dead | 17:21:55 |
K900 | By then | 17:21:56 |
ElvishJerricco | vlinkz actually reviewed it, with some valid issues | 19:19:00 |
K900 | Yeah I saw | 19:31:09 |
emily | K900: is pkgs/applications/kde/kdevelop/kdevelop.nix Plasma 5 | 21:53:24 |
K900 | Yesc | 21:54:44 |
K900 | *yes | 21:54:44 |
K900 | Everything in pkgs/applications/kde is | 21:54:52 |
emily | ok I am looking forward to you killing it with a rocket because it uses ancient LLVM | 22:08:10 |
| 10 Aug 2025 |
K900 | As soon as we land Calamares | 05:16:21 |
emily | too late I already killed it on my branch | 05:52:17 |
emily | you cannot stop me from deleting 8 compilers | 05:52:24 |
emily | no matter what you do I will delete 8 compilers | 05:52:30 |
emily | 210 files changed, 1544 insertions(+), 28662 deletions(-) | 05:52:48 |
emily | how's Plasma 6 going to compare to this | 05:52:53 |
K900 | So uh | 06:17:14 |
K900 | I have a funni | 06:17:16 |
K900 | I can fix links in calamares in the dumbest way possible | 06:17:24 |
| 11 Aug 2025 |
emily | K900: so is anyone actually maintaining Qt 5 WebEngine | 13:20:14 |
emily | I know you said KDE people would pick it up | 13:20:23 |
emily | but I sure am noticing that we are on a version from 4 months ago and I seriously doubt there have not been any CVEs that otherwise would have been backported since then | 13:20:33 |
emily | given the frequency before that https://github.com/qt/qtwebengine/commits/v5.15.19-lts | 13:20:44 |
emily | and I think that is a problem | 13:20:58 |
emily | pretty sure we have browsers using that | 13:21:02 |
K900 | There was some talk but I don't see anything either | 13:22:15 |
Grimmauld (any/all) | what actually depends on that thing? Can we knownVulnerabilities and see who complains? | 13:23:01 |
K900 | Calamares lul | 13:23:09 |
Grimmauld (any/all) | oh. | 13:23:14 |
emily | I think we need to knownVulnerabilities as part of dropping Plasma 5 | 13:23:18 |
K900 | But yeah it should be very little things | 13:23:22 |