!rGlCMuXgAhgEpdvJUz:nixos.org

NixOS KDE

205 Members
57 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
24 Apr 2025
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)unless you want to give up on having cross gui, fixing that is mandatory i am afraid19:04:51
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)And, fwiw, with that patch i did get past the little Qt stuff on the way to sdl319:05:24
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Ah wait nvm19:05:36
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)it still is fucked19:05:39
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)HUH. It seems we build sdl3 twice, but why??19:06:25
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)* HUH. It seems we build sdl3 twice, but why?? one pulls the qt, one doesn't...19:06:42
@k900:0upti.meK900Do we really need fcitx5 in SDL319:08:28
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)it is an optional dep, we could drop it19:14:27
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/blob/release-3.2.10/src/core/linux/SDL_fcitx.h the header exists, but neither https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/CategoryAPI nor https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/Libraries list it. And fedora doesn't build with it either.19:16:33
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)seems some ibus support is attached to that? But fedora builds ibus, yet lacks fcitx19:20:27
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)now i am confused19:20:33
@k900:0upti.meK900I feel like that's fine for now19:22:28
@k900:0upti.meK900Unfucking Qt cross is a lot more work19:22:36
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)do we drop fcitx from sdl3 on cross or in general?19:22:58
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/401534 there, should help a bit19:38:51
@k900:0upti.meK900 @Grimmauld (any/all) ofborg basically tries to build the entire stdenv on staging PRs 19:46:12
@k900:0upti.meK900And times out19:46:13
@k900:0upti.meK900It's fun19:46:15
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)hm alright then19:46:29
@k900:0upti.meK900It's got something like 3 hours of timeout19:46:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Per job19:46:46
@k900:0upti.meK900And "job" means "the entire closure"19:46:51
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI don't knwo why the limit hasn't been raised.19:50:33
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily* I don't know why the limit hasn't been raised.19:50:35
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit surely wastes more cycles doing this than it would with a higher timeout.19:50:41
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/401554 hehe, fixing cross builds isn't actually all that difficult! Will do the other things tomorrow, but this is a start20:43:36
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)will do qt once i am a bit more confident, but i got past the sdl now, so making progress20:44:17
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) and should probably move to #cross-compiling:nixos.org now 20:44:25
@k900:0upti.meK900Hahaha no you won't lmao 20:44:33
@k900:0upti.meK900 Meson is generally mostly competent at cross 20:45:01

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9