| 24 Apr 2025 |
 K900 | qt6 should be doable but needs someone to put time into it | 18:54:59 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | problem is, this goes into fctix5 -> sdl3 -> literally everything | 19:04:19 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * problem is, this goes into fctix5 -> sdl3 -> literally everything gui | 19:04:30 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | unless you want to give up on having cross gui, fixing that is mandatory i am afraid | 19:04:51 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | And, fwiw, with that patch i did get past the little Qt stuff on the way to sdl3 | 19:05:24 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | Ah wait nvm | 19:05:36 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | it still is fucked | 19:05:39 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | HUH. It seems we build sdl3 twice, but why?? | 19:06:25 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * HUH. It seems we build sdl3 twice, but why?? one pulls the qt, one doesn't... | 19:06:42 |
| K900 | Do we really need fcitx5 in SDL3 | 19:08:28 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | it is an optional dep, we could drop it | 19:14:27 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/blob/release-3.2.10/src/core/linux/SDL_fcitx.h
the header exists, but neither https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/CategoryAPI nor https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/Libraries list it.
And fedora doesn't build with it either. | 19:16:33 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | seems some ibus support is attached to that? But fedora builds ibus, yet lacks fcitx | 19:20:27 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | now i am confused | 19:20:33 |
| K900 | I feel like that's fine for now | 19:22:28 |
| K900 | Unfucking Qt cross is a lot more work | 19:22:36 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | do we drop fcitx from sdl3 on cross or in general? | 19:22:58 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/401534
there, should help a bit | 19:38:51 |
| K900 | @Grimmauld (any/all) ofborg basically tries to build the entire stdenv on staging PRs | 19:46:12 |
| K900 | And times out | 19:46:13 |
| K900 | It's fun | 19:46:15 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | hm alright then | 19:46:29 |
| K900 | It's got something like 3 hours of timeout | 19:46:45 |
| K900 | Per job | 19:46:46 |
| K900 | And "job" means "the entire closure" | 19:46:51 |
 emily | I don't knwo why the limit hasn't been raised. | 19:50:33 |
| emily | * I don't know why the limit hasn't been raised. | 19:50:35 |
| emily | it surely wastes more cycles doing this than it would with a higher timeout. | 19:50:41 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/401554
hehe, fixing cross builds isn't actually all that difficult! Will do the other things tomorrow, but this is a start | 20:43:36 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | will do qt once i am a bit more confident, but i got past the sdl now, so making progress | 20:44:17 |
