| 19 Apr 2025 |
 Sandro 🐧 | But yeah, if you would redo the store, it would have extra directories with prefixes | 14:59:29 |
| 22 Apr 2025 |
|  Marmar changed their profile picture. | 05:36:15 |
| 23 Apr 2025 |
|  anji joined the room. | 16:14:05 |
| 24 Apr 2025 |
 SigmaSquadron | Should the KDE team be maintaining calligra, kup and wallpaper-engine-kde-plugin? I'm preparing the meta.maintainers = lib.teams.<team>.members -> meta.teams = [ lib.teams.<team> ] migration and switching that attribute in mkKdeDerivation caused the KDE team to start maintaining these three new packages.
I know Calligra is part of Gear, so it makes sense that the KDE team maintains it, but I'm not sure about kup.
| 03:19:15 |
 K900 | No, those probably need an explicit teams = [] then | 04:43:19 |
| SigmaSquadron | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
No, those probably need an explicit teams = [] then Since you're also a kernel maintainer, does that apply to the custom kernels (zen, lqx) as well? | 10:20:52 |
| K900 | Yes | 10:23:41 |
| K900 | Those are absolutely not in scope for people-that-actually-care-about-kernels-and-not-rice team | 10:23:52 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | i found qtsvg is broken on cross, and seems that is known: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314724
The PR is there, but it was never merged and now has merge conflicts. How does one go about these things? Do i make a superseeding PR? | 18:44:45 |
| K900 | qt cross is completely fucked | 18:54:30 |
| K900 | I want to say don't even bother with qt5 it's not worth it | 18:54:49 |
| K900 | qt6 should be doable but needs someone to put time into it | 18:54:59 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | problem is, this goes into fctix5 -> sdl3 -> literally everything | 19:04:19 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * problem is, this goes into fctix5 -> sdl3 -> literally everything gui | 19:04:30 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | unless you want to give up on having cross gui, fixing that is mandatory i am afraid | 19:04:51 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | And, fwiw, with that patch i did get past the little Qt stuff on the way to sdl3 | 19:05:24 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | Ah wait nvm | 19:05:36 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | it still is fucked | 19:05:39 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | HUH. It seems we build sdl3 twice, but why?? | 19:06:25 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * HUH. It seems we build sdl3 twice, but why?? one pulls the qt, one doesn't... | 19:06:42 |
| K900 | Do we really need fcitx5 in SDL3 | 19:08:28 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | it is an optional dep, we could drop it | 19:14:27 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/blob/release-3.2.10/src/core/linux/SDL_fcitx.h
the header exists, but neither https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/CategoryAPI nor https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/Libraries list it.
And fedora doesn't build with it either. | 19:16:33 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | seems some ibus support is attached to that? But fedora builds ibus, yet lacks fcitx | 19:20:27 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | now i am confused | 19:20:33 |
| K900 | I feel like that's fine for now | 19:22:28 |
| K900 | Unfucking Qt cross is a lot more work | 19:22:36 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | do we drop fcitx from sdl3 on cross or in general? | 19:22:58 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/401534
there, should help a bit | 19:38:51 |
| K900 | @Grimmauld (any/all) ofborg basically tries to build the entire stdenv on staging PRs | 19:46:12 |
