| 12 Dec 2025 |
 K900 | That means we have to fix them one by one then | 12:28:01 |
| K900 | Is really what I meant | 12:28:07 |
| K900 | This sucks | 12:28:10 |
| K900 | (and it doesn't cause issues presumably because the cache is entirely optional and it will just JIT if something isn't cached) | 12:28:33 |
 raboof | right, ordering in time more than ordering in order. but yeah, each will need individual fixes sadly. in a perfect world of course the generator would somehow pick up on such missing dependencies, but I'm already in way over my head understanding as much/little of that build system as I do :) | 12:29:04 |
| K900 | Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah | 12:29:16 |
| K900 | The thing is, missing dependencies are fine | 12:29:25 |
| K900 | In general | 12:29:26 |
| K900 | Because like pretty much every QML file ever depends on Qt.Quick | 12:29:40 |
| K900 | And you don't want to have that pulled into the cache for your app | 12:29:49 |
| K900 | You want to use the hopefully already existing cache in the system | 12:29:58 |
| K900 | So it's expected that it doesn't require full source for everything | 12:30:23 |
| K900 | Also qtdeclarative needs to go to staging now | 12:30:47 |
| K900 | It's too big | 12:30:49 |
| raboof | (yeah I expected as much but was waiting for nixpkgs-ci to tell me ;) - now rebased) | 12:31:58 |
| raboof | * (yeah I expected as much but was waiting for nixpkgs-ci to tell me ;) - now retargeted) | 12:32:09 |
| K900 | Need to rebase now :( | 12:33:08 |
| K900 | Cause I also merged another backport | 12:33:12 |
| K900 | A few days ago | 12:33:15 |
| raboof | unfortunately I also haven't quite figured out how to go from "these methods get inconsistently generated" to "this dependency is not declared" - so for powerdevil and libplasma I've opened upstream issues in kde with that pointer (which were 'confirmed' but no other action yet) | 12:54:56 |
| 14 Dec 2025 |
|  srounce joined the room. | 10:12:46 |
| srounce | Hey K900I made this PR to fix an issue in FreeCAD where it will crash under Gnome 49 whenever a file browser is opened, due to gtk3 gsettings-schema not being present. Would it be worth applying something like this to all Qt apps via wrapQtAppsHook as it seems many applications are affected. | 10:16:03 |
| K900 | No | 10:16:15 |
| K900 | This is the stupid thing again | 10:16:22 |
| K900 | We need some sort of global solution but slapping wrapGAppsHook on every Qt application is not it | 10:16:33 |
| srounce | Yes I was hoping you’d have a suggest for a better solution than that as it’s rather clumsy | 10:22:35 |
| K900 | Possibly we should just patch Qt to take the XDG portal path | 10:24:38 |
| srounce | aren’t all Qt applications using wrapQtAppsHook? | 10:29:16 |
| K900 | Yes, and some of them do Really Interesting Things | 10:29:34 |
| srounce | * | 10:29:36 |
