!rGlCMuXgAhgEpdvJUz:nixos.org

NixOS KDE

203 Members
57 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
8 Mar 2025
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriad changed their display name from qyriad to Qyriad.21:41:03
9 Mar 2025
@amadaluzia:tchncs.deamadaluzia[tde] changed their profile picture.08:40:19
10 Mar 2025
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles left the room.22:29:21
11 Mar 2025
@jtelscott:frei.chatjtelscott joined the room.14:10:44
@federicodschonborn:matrix.orgFederico Damián Schonborn changed their display name from Federico Damián (he/they) to This Federico Damián is licensed under the terms of the he/him or they/them pronouns, at your choice.23:20:56
@adam_neverwas:matrix.orgAdam Neverwas removed their display name adam_neverwas.23:24:10
12 Mar 2025
@qbit:tapenet.orgqbitugh, taskbar and what not seem to be crashing13:46:00
@qbit:tapenet.orgqbitWed 2025-03-12 07:03:11 MDT 4415 175 175 SIGABRT inaccessible /nix/store/306551cj1nhs7s9004p09pavy3590i0j-kscreen-6.3.2/libexec/.kscreen_osd_service-wrapped -13:47:19
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧What about using cmake+ninja in kdePackages?13:48:40
@k900:0upti.meK900Probably should yeah 13:58:23
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧currently building my system with it. If it doesn't fail I PR it14:21:53
@adam_neverwas:matrix.orgAdam Neverwas set their display name to Adam Neverwas.14:27:30
@k900:0upti.meK900Send it to staging IMO14:30:33
@k900:0upti.meK900It'll be right on the cutoff anyway14:30:46
@k900:0upti.meK900And there's no rush14:30:49
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythere is a plan to make cmake use ninja by default fwiw14:58:00
@k900:0upti.meK900Where? 15:02:57
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧that should not even be 500 rebuilds so no need for staging https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/38925815:12:13
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧longest to build was libreoffice. The rest was done after 30 minutes or so15:12:31
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Where?
well, I didn't say a PR :P just that we agreed on the cmakeHook thing a while back
15:17:01
@aidalgol:matrix.orgaidalgol Should this bugfix be in nixpkgs by now? I can't figure out myself because I don't quite understand how KDE+Qt are split up (upstream and in nixpkgs). 19:15:14
@k900:0upti.meK900No19:16:03
@k900:0upti.meK900It's in Qt 6.919:16:05
@k900:0upti.meK900Currently targeted for the 25th19:16:22
@k900:0upti.meK900So probably two staging cycles from now19:16:27
@aidalgol:matrix.orgaidalgolIs that Qt/KDE staging cycles, or nixpkgs staging cycles?19:19:21
@aidalgol:matrix.orgaidalgolAnd for future reference, what does "FF" mean in the "Fix version" field on Qt's Jira?19:19:40
@k900:0upti.meK900nixpkgs staging cycles19:23:44
@k900:0upti.meK900Qt/KDE don't have those19:23:47
@k900:0upti.meK900Not sure what FF means19:24:37

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9