| 22 Feb 2025 |
 emily | I really don't feel like relitigating this every couple weeks when there's a security issue. | 20:46:54 |
| 23 Feb 2025 |
|  bastaynav joined the room. | 10:37:25 |
|  amadaluzia[tde] joined the room. | 18:52:06 |
 Sandro π§ | I know that you value security way over usability of people | 20:54:28 |
| Sandro π§ | but it is just a fact that you cannot remove all vulnerable software from your life and still live. | 20:54:41 |
| Sandro π§ | but that has been an issue since I first heard of NixOS and 5 years back we already weighted marking things vulnerable and having them cached π€· | 20:56:28 |
| Sandro π§ | shawn8901: do you want to open a PR for https://github.com/Shawn8901/nixpkgs/commit/735fd4615f6e6844a25ad14638680024a3ff4be8 ? Even if we cannot change the default, I want those options in https://github.com/Shawn8901/nixpkgs/commit/735fd4615f6e6844a25ad14638680024a3ff4be8 | 20:56:48 |
| Sandro π§ | * shawn8901: do you want to open a PR for https://github.com/Shawn8901/nixpkgs/commit/735fd4615f6e6844a25ad14638680024a3ff4be8 ? Even if we cannot change the default, I want those options in. | 20:56:54 |
 shawn8901 | In reply to @sandro:supersandro.de
shawn8901: do you want to open a PR for https://github.com/Shawn8901/nixpkgs/commit/735fd4615f6e6844a25ad14638680024a3ff4be8 ? Even if we cannot change the default, I want those options in. Sure I can do tomorrow, I wasn't sure on the other PR when I asked if it was finally wanted or not. | 23:18:47 |
| shawn8901 | The options sadly can just be tuned by overriding the package. I am using that since some times as I am trying to reduce the perl usage on my systems | 23:21:29 |
| shawn8901 | * The options sadly can just be tuned by overriding the package. I am using that (salute backend) since some times as I am trying to reduce the perl usage on my systems | 23:22:23 |
| 24 Feb 2025 |
| amadaluzia[tde] changed their profile picture. | 13:55:16 |
| shawn8901 | Sandro π§: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/384804 | 16:28:05 |
 K900 | Can we make that one option? | 17:05:52 |
| K900 | I don't think building all the backends is something that makes sense in most cases | 17:06:02 |
| K900 | Because it's not like you can (reasonably) switch at runtime anyway | 17:06:16 |
 πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | Why Discover doesn't have comments/rating feature on NixOS? | 18:30:48 |
| K900 | I think we don't have appstream metadata? | 18:31:11 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | but it gets it from flatpak? | 18:31:28 |
| K900 | Actually does it even work with flatpak | 18:31:33 |
| K900 | I'm not sure if it does | 18:31:39 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | yes | 18:31:44 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | i use it | 18:31:47 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | everything works except comments. it tries to load them but then the section disappears. | 18:32:09 |
| shawn8901 | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Can we make that one option? Hot should it be called? Or no option at all, so that one can just run whatever they want? | 19:06:52 |
| K900 | Just like, backend = "sqlite" | 19:07:18 |
| shawn8901 | Yeah okay that makes totally sense and is less overcomplicated π
| 19:19:30 |
| shawn8901 | I guess I made something, please let me know if that wasn't what you meant. | 19:34:03 |
| K900 | I'll take a look tomorrow | 19:35:36 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | Hmm, ODRS seem to vbe down | 19:50:22 |
