| 20 Feb 2025 |
 πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | the current one is named app-org.kde.krdpserver.service | 15:34:07 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | now Remmina connects but gets no image... | 15:44:03 |
 Sandro π§ | white or with scrambled screen at the top? | 16:16:47 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | no image at all, I see only the window background color | 17:18:10 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | first it gets white image but as soon as I allow conenction in portal dialog, the image disappears at all | 17:18:34 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | after I allowed, white image appears only for a second after connection | 17:19:10 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | building remmina with freerdp3 without openh264 so it uses ffmpeg | 18:07:59 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | IT WORKS | 18:16:48 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | 
Download image.png | 18:17:26 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | { pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {} }:
pkgs.remmina.override {
freerdp3 = pkgs.freerdp3.override {
openh264 = null;
};
}
| 18:17:27 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | arch builds without openh264 https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/remmina/ | 18:18:46 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/blob/feba8c09027b74cccf99b2ee591b5d4c680aee74/libfreerdp/codec/h264.c#L662-L672 | 18:21:03 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | * https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/blob/feba8c09027b74cccf99b2ee591b5d4c680aee74/libfreerdp/codec/h264.c#L662-L673 | 18:21:21 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | * arch builds without openh264 https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/freerdp/ | 18:45:48 |
 SigmaSquadron | In reply to @ilya-fedin:matrix.org
sent an image. aw cute | 19:53:45 |
| Sandro π§ | but why? | 20:11:07 |
| Sandro π§ | Should we disable that by default in freerdp3? | 20:11:34 |
| Sandro π§ | I kinda keep freerdp3 up to date and remmina is like the only consume I care about | 20:13:54 |
| 21 Feb 2025 |
 K900 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/383664#event-16405139897 | 18:21:46 |
| K900 | Plasma 5 is now officially deprecated | 18:21:52 |
| K900 | Get your pitchfork proof vests on | 18:22:07 |
 mjm | π | 18:22:07 |
 emily | is it time to start thinking about removing Qt 5 WebEngine? | 18:27:36 |
| K900 | Not yet at least | 18:28:43 |
| K900 | After 25.05 maybe | 18:28:45 |
| K900 | Also, Qt5 WebEngine is ... somewhat maintained? | 18:28:58 |
| K900 | Like, kinda sorta? | 18:29:02 |
| K900 | I wouldn't say it's active, but they backport big security fixes at leats | 18:29:43 |
| K900 | I wouldn't say it's active, but they backport big security fixes at least | 18:29:44 |
| emily | isn't the EOL coming up around 25.05's release? | 18:31:13 |
