| 12 Dec 2025 |
 K900 | Do you have an upstream bug link? | 12:05:05 |
 aktaboot | yeah I get that, it ddid pull akonadi and other stuff though | 12:05:29 |
| aktaboot | https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468353 | 12:06:21 |
| K900 | You also need to have a matching version of system akonadi because it's running as a service | 12:06:22 |
| aktaboot | yeah I'll see when everything hits nixos-unstable! | 12:07:10 |
| K900 | Ughhhhh | 12:07:28 |
| K900 | I think this is that one thing | 12:07:31 |
| K900 | That's in staging | 12:07:48 |
| aktaboot | you mean fixed in upstream staging? | 12:08:12 |
| K900 | Fixed in Qt 6.10.2 and cherry-picked to our staging | 12:09:13 |
| K900 | Either give it like two weeks | 12:09:33 |
| K900 | Or try https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/8ae30516b638d364cbc121fe307e841a9f22f737 | 12:09:35 |
| K900 | (it'll be a kitchen sink rebuild though) | 12:09:42 |
| aktaboot | and i'd preferrably set all my system to that branch for testing right | 12:10:56 |
| K900 | Well | 12:11:25 |
| K900 | You can overlay qtdeclarative with just that patch | 12:11:30 |
| K900 | It'll be fine | 12:11:33 |
| K900 | But you'd still have to rebuild all of Qt basically | 12:11:49 |
| K900 | Including qtwebengine which is a chromium | 12:11:54 |
| aktaboot | okay might not try that then :> | 12:12:10 |
| aktaboot | two weeks is fine | 12:12:37 |
| K900 | Yeah I think this is going to be like | 12:12:40 |
| K900 | Double digit hours on reasonable hardware | 12:12:49 |
| K900 | Or like 3-4 hours of Big Computer | 12:13:10 |
| aktaboot | and triple digits on a laptop :D | 12:13:27 |
| K900 | Nah | 12:13:34 |
| K900 | Definitely not that bad | 12:13:38 |
| aktaboot | yeah im jokin | 12:13:40 |
| K900 | qtwebengine is like a 6 hour build on a normal Hydra build slot and those are both tiny and overcommitted to hell | 12:14:05 |
| K900 | @raboof so wait does this mean there's no inherent issue | 12:23:42 |
