!rGlCMuXgAhgEpdvJUz:nixos.org

NixOS KDE

223 Members
61 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Oct 2024
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedif we're doing 6.7 in 24.11 maybe it makes sense to merge the patch anyway for all the kde users, and rebase it for 6.8 when thats ready?08:08:06
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Because right now this cycle is going like this08:08:09
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️image.png
Download image.png
08:08:11
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxed
In reply to @outfoxxed:outfoxxed.me
if we're doing 6.7 in 24.11 maybe it makes sense to merge the patch anyway for all the kde users, and rebase it for 6.8 when thats ready?
if not ill wait till 6.8 to fix the nits and rebase
08:09:01
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️The problem is we don't know if we're doing 6.7 or 6.8 before we try 6.808:09:35
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedah are you testing for application correctness or just that everything builds08:10:04
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Mostly the former08:10:13
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Hydra can take care of the latter08:10:17
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️But with e.g. 6.7.3 people are reporting weird runtime crashes08:10:26
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️That I personally haven't hit but there's a lot of talk in the Plasma rooms08:10:41
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedtheres lots of nasty ones in quick08:10:42
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedhit them personally a fair bit08:10:51
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️And that's not something Hydra can catch08:10:56
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedpersonally would probably just hold off on 6.8 unless plasma can actually be fully tested in that time08:11:49
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️If we get 6.8 into the next cycle and it goes closer to a normal timeline (i.e. 1-1.5 weeks and not 3), we'll have over a month to release08:13:12
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️And we'll definitely have at least one more cycle to revert to 6.7 if it's really ba08:13:23
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️* And we'll definitely have at least one more cycle to revert to 6.7 if it's really bad08:13:24
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedprobably good enough then08:13:36
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️But if it goes for 3 weeks, we'll have maybe two weeks to last possible revert point08:14:32
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️And that's going to suck08:14:39
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️I guess one thing we have going for us is that there's other distros08:14:59
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️That don't need two weeks to ship a Qt update08:15:12
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxed please beta test, arch 🙏 08:15:17
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️So we may have a rough baseline for 6.8 from that08:15:29
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedis that two weeks worth of qt rebuilds or just having to fit that in a staging cycle08:15:58
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Or maybe I'm overthinking all of this and Randy just killed it on the Darwin stdenv rewrite and it'll go smoothly and we will not have problems08:16:14
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️
In reply to@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.me
is that two weeks worth of qt rebuilds or just having to fit that in a staging cycle
The overall staging cycle
08:16:20
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Qt itself is something like 3k rebuilds08:16:37
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Which is not insignificant, but not a huge amount by staging terms08:16:48
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxed
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Or maybe I'm overthinking all of this and Randy just killed it on the Darwin stdenv rewrite and it'll go smoothly and we will not have problems
good luck lol
08:17:24

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9