| 21 Feb 2025 |
 K900 | After 25.05 maybe | 18:28:45 |
| K900 | Also, Qt5 WebEngine is ... somewhat maintained? | 18:28:58 |
| K900 | Like, kinda sorta? | 18:29:02 |
| K900 | I wouldn't say it's active, but they backport big security fixes at leats | 18:29:43 |
| K900 | I wouldn't say it's active, but they backport big security fixes at least | 18:29:44 |
 emily | isn't the EOL coming up around 25.05's release? | 18:31:13 |
| emily | so the first Chromium security bug after that will probably not get backported? | 18:31:24 |
| K900 | The Qt people are aware of the state of the ecosystem | 18:37:38 |
| K900 | And they've done this before | 18:37:40 |
| K900 | As in, announce a EOL date then break it | 18:37:47 |
| emily | mhm | 18:39:13 |
| emily | but it seems like it would be a good idea to prepare for the eventuality we have to knownVulnerabilities it on stable | 18:39:23 |
| K900 | Very possible | 18:39:35 |
 πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | perhaps there's some incompatibility between the way krdp uses libx264 and freerdp uses libopenh264? | 19:51:18 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | * perhaps there's some incompatibility between the way krdp uses libx264 and the way freerdp uses libopenh264? | 19:51:28 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | i guess we won't get answers any time soon, krdp reports seem to be unassigned | 19:52:13 |
 aidalgol | Does plasma-plasmashell crash or lock up often for anyone else? | 19:56:38 |
| K900 | Not for me | 21:03:39 |
| K900 | Get a stacktrace? | 21:04:00 |
| aidalgol | Not recently. How would I get one next time it happens? | 21:12:34 |
| K900 | coredumpctl debug | 21:13:07 |
| aidalgol | And what about when it just freezes but doesn't crash? I sometimes have to restart the systemd user service to make it responsive again. | 21:14:05 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | you can try to kill -ABRT it | 22:12:48 |
| 22 Feb 2025 |
 Sandro π§ | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
but it seems like it would be a good idea to prepare for the eventuality we have to knownVulnerabilities it on stable Again If we would just still compile that software no one would complain | 12:01:30 |
| Sandro π§ | But since we don't it is like taking people still using that software from behind with no lube | 12:01:59 |
| Sandro π§ | and we probably waste a bunch of compute for nothing | 12:02:17 |
| Sandro π§ | In reply to @ilya-fedin:matrix.org
i guess we won't get answers any time soon, krdp reports seem to be unassigned Last time I opened an issue I got response about it a week after but no fix | 12:03:08 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | they were saying my trace with kpipewire is due to something with kwallet so... | 12:05:25 |
| Sandro π§ | NotLikeThat | 12:16:10 |
| emily | In reply to @sandro:supersandro.de
Again If we would just still compile that software no one would complain not sure what the point of reiterating this discussion every time vulnerable packages come up is. it was hashed out pretty thoroughly on the PR. | 14:00:05 |
