| 15 Oct 2024 |
 πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | qt 5 applications seem to be ok... | 21:50:51 |
| 16 Oct 2024 |
 K900 | Qt 6.8 maybe | 02:26:55 |
| K900 | Somehow | 02:26:57 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | the weirdest thing is that it doesn't even show in QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS | 12:17:04 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | Looks like Qt doesn't recognize symlinks as plugins anymore | 12:57:35 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | running QT_PLUGIN_PATH=/run/current-system/sw/lib/qt-6/plugins systemsettings doesn't even detect breeze | 12:57:53 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | ο ξ° ls /run/current-system/sw/lib/qt-6/plugins/styles
breeze6.so libkvantum.so
| 12:58:13 |
| K900 | Huh | 12:58:51 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | looks like someone already made a bug report for it
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-130109 | 13:20:43 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | thanks god | 13:20:45 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | I wonder whether the wrapper for binary firefox (I use firefox-beta-bin from the mozilla overlay but it uses the wrapper from nixpkgs iirc) lacks rpath/ld_library_path for libproxy? As firefox doesn't seem to follow KDE proxy settings... | 14:43:30 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | * I wonder whether the wrapper for binary firefox (I use firefox-beta-bin from the mozilla overlay but it uses the wrapper from nixpkgs iirc) lacks rpath/ld_library_path for libproxy? As it doesn't seem to follow KDE proxy settings... | 14:44:49 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | And I wonder whether there's any about:config knob to make it use portal proxy resolver... | 14:46:19 |
| K900 | https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/597856 | 16:06:29 |
| K900 | Fixes the plugins-through-symlinks issue | 16:06:36 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | In reply to @ilya-fedin:matrix.org
I wonder whether the wrapper for binary firefox (I use firefox-beta-bin from the mozilla overlay but it uses the wrapper from nixpkgs iirc) lacks rpath/ld_library_path for libproxy? As it doesn't seem to follow KDE proxy settings... oh, so they added support for it 15 years ago and broke 9 years ago. lol.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517655
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1220399 | 19:05:35 |
| 17 Oct 2024 |
| K900 | 
Download {6FB9378F-124B-4EFF-BB54-253DC9C927D5}.png | 14:52:46 |
| K900 | lol | 14:52:51 |
| 18 Oct 2024 |
 outfoxxed | K900: updated caching patch to 6.8, also tested somewhat thoroughly | 00:41:22 |
| K900 | Cool, I'll take a look, but at this point I think this might be an after branchoff kind of deal | 01:12:43 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | will we get the symlink fix before 6.8.1? | 13:29:00 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | 
Download image.png | 13:29:38 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | waiting more than a month isn't really appealing | 13:30:07 |
| K900 | Yes | 13:30:10 |
| K900 | It's in staging-next | 13:30:13 |
| K900 | I picked it | 13:30:15 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | nice | 13:32:13 |
 w | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
And nothing exploded Here It is on fire since I've upgraded to 24.05+plasma6
Almost nothing work on graphical. | 16:37:08 |
| K900 | This was not at all about 24.05 | 16:37:49 |
| K900 | Are you on Nvidia? | 16:37:53 |
