!rGlCMuXgAhgEpdvJUz:nixos.org

NixOS KDE

219 Members
59 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Oct 2024
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)Most of the stuff got relocated here07:59:46
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedI'll rewrite it for that ig08:00:02
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)But yeah maybe we put this on hold08:00:14
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)Until we land 6.808:00:16
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedafter 6.8 is in nixpkgs so I don't have to rebuild my entire system08:00:18
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedteah08:00:19
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxed * yeah08:00:21
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)And then rebase on 6.808:00:22
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedcan do08:00:27
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old) @Nick Cao wanted 6.8 in 24.11 08:00:33
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)I'm not confident but the KDE rooms are also saying 6.7.3 breaks a bunch of shit08:00:49
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)So maybe we go for that08:00:52
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxed
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
@Nick Cao wanted 6.8 in 24.11
ideally this can get in there too
ill try to get an isolated environment with 6.8 to test in
08:01:19
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedsince I don't feel like rebuilding for 10 hours08:01:35
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)The problem with getting 6.8 in 24.11 is that it'll be our last staging cycle before freeze08:02:09
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)And the same cycle will have the Darwin stdenv rewrite08:02:17
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedso its going to be a massive rebuild and we likely wont have time to get the patch in even if 6.8 can get in?08:02:39
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)The patch is fine to get in after freeze probably08:02:56
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedstdenv rewrite means rebuilding every package on darwin probably, right?08:03:03
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)Happens every staging cycle anyway08:03:10
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)It's more about how long fixing the regressions will take08:03:22
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)And how that affects the timeline for future staging cycles08:03:33
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedwhats the freeze date? if the patch is ready before then is there a chance it could be applied during the regression test period or should i just wait08:04:15
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)Basically what I'm worried about is that the cycle being too long and then we don't have enough time to dogfood 6.808:05:04
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)To be confident08:05:06
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)* Basically what I'm worried about is the cycle being too long and then we don't have enough time to dogfood 6.808:05:14
@outfoxxed:outfoxxed.meoutfoxxedyeah I've seen a fair amount of regressions for "minor" version bumps that it might be worth pushing off to the next release08:06:08
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)And ideally I'd like to get 6.8 and the patch in two separate cycles so we don't have to play "was it this change or that change" when something epxplodes08:06:20
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)* And ideally I'd like to get 6.8 and the patch in two separate cycles so we don't have to play "was it this change or that change" when something explodes08:06:23
@k900:0upti.meK900 (Old)And the timeline is tight08:06:38

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9