!rGlCMuXgAhgEpdvJUz:nixos.org

NixOS KDE

203 Members
56 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
9 Dec 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900Wait no it's just github diff rendering being stupid08:09:41
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Ah ugh08:09:50
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Nvm then sorry08:10:00
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Ah yeah I see. Damn github ui is pain08:10:36
@k900:0upti.meK900Also I have no clue how we haven't hit this the entire time08:22:57
@k900:0upti.meK900But that Qt cmake flag is something we need to patch out08:23:19
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm testing a patch now08:23:21
@k900:0upti.meK900Because the default for Qt's internal "find that other Qt bit" helpers assumes a shared prefix08:23:38
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Is that why Qt cross gets the tool paths hardcoded?08:24:54
@k900:0upti.meK900No08:28:54
@k900:0upti.meK900Or at least I don't think so08:29:59
@k900:0upti.meK900I genuinely can't follow the entire Qt cmake setup without my head exploding though08:30:18
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/46925610:47:42
11 Dec 2025
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/437521 still needs reviews, its been stuck since august, but i don't know nearly enough qt to make that review10:12:27
@k900:0upti.meK900Great10:13:07
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)i guess it has two approves, but i am not really sure10:13:11
@k900:0upti.meK900A third Qt binding has just hit the towers10:13:14
@k900:0upti.meK900What even uses this again10:13:19
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧csound-qt and gepetto-viewer14:40:41
@k900:0upti.meK900Two entire things14:45:35
@k900:0upti.meK900Yaaaaaay14:45:37
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧and one of them is marked broken in the PR 😅14:55:41
@h0lylag:matrix.orgh0ly lag changed their display name from h0lylag to h0ly lag.21:05:07
@k900:0upti.meK900Hmmmm21:34:30
@k900:0upti.meK900Supposedly the Akonadi backend migration actually works on 25.1221:34:46
@k900:0upti.meK900I wonder if this is the time to default to sqlite21:34:55
12 Dec 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900 @raboof do you want to backport the r11y patches to 6.10.1 10:53:59
@k900:0upti.meK9006.10.2 is at least a month off10:54:04
@k900:0upti.meK900And we should have a staging cycle soon-ish10:54:11
@raboof:matrix.orgraboofit would be good to be able to validate they have the intended effect, but I'm also OK with waiting a month, I don't want to annoy the maintainers (you) with churn 😃. If you're happy to take them I'd be happy to PR cherry-picking those patches.11:02:11

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9