| 25 Aug 2025 |
 Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) | but there is aQT_MAJOR_VERSION, imo the arch package is weird | 20:39:03 |
 emily | huh? | 20:39:09 |
| emily | we offer the fcitx5-qt stuff for both Qt 5 and Qt 6 | 20:39:15 |
| emily | and seemingly default to the former via alias | 20:39:19 |
| emily | I think we just need to drop the former and migrate to the latter, for all those packages | 20:39:27 |
| emily | and then no more Qt 5 in that closure | 20:39:34 |
| Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) | yeah that sounds reasonable | 20:39:41 |
| emily | though | 20:39:50 |
| emily | paths = [
fcitx5
libsForQt5.fcitx5-qt
qt6Packages.fcitx5-qt
fcitx5-gtk
]
| 20:39:52 |
| emily | maybe this is one of those things where you need both because lol input methods | 20:39:58 |
| emily | K900: do you have wisdom | 20:40:01 |
| Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) | i hate graphical systems so damn much | 20:40:17 |
| emily | but fwiw the test only does
fcitx5.addons = [
pkgs.fcitx5-chinese-addons
pkgs.fcitx5-hangul
pkgs.fcitx5-m17n
pkgs.fcitx5-mozc
];
| 20:40:34 |
| emily | which only pulls in the Qt 5 one | 20:40:37 |
| emily | so I don't expect only pulling in the Qt 6 one could be worse | 20:40:43 |
 K900 | No | 20:40:55 |
| K900 | I don't know fcitx | 20:40:58 |
| emily | welp | 20:57:37 |
