| 14 Nov 2025 |
 K900 | I think the proper fix is to basically build a "cross qt" properly, with targetPlatform | 08:36:24 |
| K900 | Which is very cursed | 08:36:30 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | the problem is, the canExecute check is different than whatever cmake checks to detect cross, and that mismatch causes issues | 08:42:53 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | sure i could build it fully cross, but i don't see the reason to. If i can execute, then i can cheat and build that part as native | 08:43:31 |
| 18 Nov 2025 |
|  jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) changed their display name from jopejoe1 to jopejoe1 (4094@39c3). | 20:19:03 |
| 20 Nov 2025 |
|  John joined the room. | 06:25:27 |
| 21 Nov 2025 |
| K900 | The extra thicc menus are going back to normal: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/463688 | 08:52:11 |
| K900 | @raboof tbh I really don't fuck with these reproducibility "fixes" | 13:56:35 |
| K900 | It really feels like we're masking the real issue | 13:56:45 |
| K900 | And someone just needs to go and dig that up instead of trying to cover every Qt application with weird bandaids | 13:57:12 |
 raboof | yeah I agree we should prioritize upstream fixes over nixpkgs bandaids. I did nudge upstream, but sometimes it's tempting to apply a local workaround when the upstream thing looks complicated :) | 15:50:55 |
| raboof | (but the issues just disappeared from the qt jira?? - hope it's just part of their migration) | 15:52:37 |
|  Vera Gradient joined the room. | 21:20:05 |
|  keenanw joined the room. | 22:25:11 |
| 23 Nov 2025 |
 Sandro 🐧 | K900 whats the reason behind this https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/libraries/qt-6/modules/qtbase/default.nix#L312 ?
This makes it so, that when you do lib.getDev on qt6.qtbase , you get an output where not really the expected dev headers are
| 02:07:05 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Found that while finally finishing https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/338498 | 03:01:58 |
| K900 | Not really no | 03:38:19 |
| K900 | Should be possible to drop? | 03:38:35 |
| 24 Nov 2025 |
|  grimmauld (any/all) joined the room. | 12:45:42 |
| 25 Nov 2025 |
| Sandro 🐧 | We probably just need to find the workarounds added for that and drop them, too | 16:05:58 |
| Sandro 🐧 | but I probably don't find the time right now to fix that ... | 16:06:06 |
| Sandro 🐧 | btw can you take a look at the libreoffice PR? | 16:06:14 |
| K900 | Should be doable now that branch-off is over | 16:06:22 |
| K900 | It looks OK to me but I don't trust that thing | 16:06:41 |
| K900 | And I don't want to abyss domain expert myself into it | 16:06:52 |
| Sandro 🐧 | The person that originally implemented it, is not active right now 😅 | 16:17:24 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Before the symlinkJoin basically force combined the dev and libs into one derivativion and now they are separate and it removes a ton of dev things from a normal system | 16:18:13 |
| 26 Nov 2025 |
 Marie | https://blogs.kde.org/2025/11/26/going-all-in-on-a-wayland-future/ | 14:36:40 |
| K900 | Yay | 14:37:07 |
| K900 | The writing was very much on the wall tbh | 14:37:33 |
