| 29 Aug 2025 |
 aidalgol | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/425e45b2a10122f752d44b3fd2e7bc778daf1ff3/pkgs/top-level/aliases.nix#L56 | 23:01:22 |
 Sandro π§ | Found one breakage on one of my systems due to the Plasma 5 removals https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/438418 | 23:03:33 |
 emily | wow, I'm surprised this hasn't caught more stuff | 23:09:07 |
| emily | can you try making the throws filtered on !(builtins.hasAttr k super)? | 23:09:53 |
| emily | and also move plasma5Throws into the mapAliases call perhaps? | 23:10:12 |
| emily | which would have caught this | 23:10:14 |
| aidalgol | It looks like it should already be getting filtered. mapAliases is invoked on that giant attrset, which is merged with plasma5Throws, and mapAliases already has that checkInPkgs filter. So I think we should figure out why that's not catching it before moving things around. | 23:17:57 |
| emily | no | 23:45:02 |
| emily | mapAliases { β¦ } // β¦ is (mapAliases { β¦ }) // β¦ | 23:45:16 |
| emily | and the check only causes errors, doesn't filter | 23:45:21 |
| emily | so the fix is mapAliases ({ β¦ } // β¦) except that might cause a horrible reindentation so maybe just add mapAliases to plasma5Throws, but more importantly it needs a filter. or just dropping the problematic packages from the list I guess | 23:45:49 |
| 30 Aug 2025 |
| Sandro π§ | Has anyone a good idea how to do https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/409986#issuecomment-3217982330 by default so that dolphin works better for everyone?
| 01:47:21 |
| Sandro π§ | Do we want to do a programs.dolphin ? | 01:47:26 |
| aidalgol | emily: How's this? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/438479 | 02:14:38 |
| aidalgol | OK, that broke eval. How do I run locally whatever check the nixpkgs-vet CI job is doing? | 02:18:37 |
| Sandro π§ | you can't seem to just copy the command from CI ... a shame | 02:41:30 |
| Sandro π§ | but nota seems to be already a package, so that alias probably needs to go | 02:41:40 |
| aidalgol | I finally found where how to run locally is documented: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/by-name/README.md#validation | 02:46:06 |
 K900 | Possibly yes, and it should be enough to have that on XDG_CONFIG_DIRS | 05:41:18 |
| K900 | Oh no I thought I checked all of them :( | 05:42:03 |
| K900 | Sorry | 05:42:16 |
| K900 | That bit was automated and I can only assume I fucked something up | 05:42:39 |
| aidalgol | No worries. | 05:43:35 |
 πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | @k900:0upti.me: do you plan to stop having qtwayland as a dep for all Qt 6 packages with 6.10? | 09:29:30 |
| K900 | Yes | 09:29:35 |
| K900 | Assuming it moves to qtbase | 09:29:39 |
| K900 | It'll just be in qtbase | 09:29:43 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | It moves but adwaita CSD is still in qtwayland | 09:29:55 |
| πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | As it depends on qtsvh | 09:30:03 |
| K900 | It's OK GNOME users deserve to suffer | 09:30:05 |
