| 26 Aug 2025 |
 emily | but yeah this works | 20:10:11 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | it was removed from our package by someone who knows more fcitx than i do so 🤷 | 20:10:20 |
| emily | where? | 20:10:35 |
| emily | I am looking at the diff and I still see qtwebengine | 20:10:45 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | ah damn i am blind | 20:11:21 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | oops | 20:11:24 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | so yeah this is just the qt6 update we wanted | 20:11:40 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | good enough | 20:11:42 |
| emily | yeah I'm satisfied :P | 20:11:54 |
| emily | so I guess gepetto-* and csound are the only other things that seemed potentially worth reviving | 20:12:16 |
| 27 Aug 2025 |
|  bktej joined the room. | 03:22:15 |
|  ➡️@amadaluzia:unredacted.org changed their profile picture. | 11:32:43 |
|  @nullcube:matrix.org left the room. | 12:14:29 |
| 29 Aug 2025 |
 K900 | So does anyone want to do more deleting around https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/435812 | 10:18:08 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | oh hey K900 more eval errors wrt fcitx! | 14:02:15 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | oh wait just unfortunate timing of unstable-small advance, sorry | 14:03:08 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * ~~oh hey K900 more eval errors wrt fcitx!~~ | 14:04:18 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | i guess i go straight to master then | 14:04:35 |
| K900 | Huh | 14:05:08 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | wait what the hell is going on | 14:05:51 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | i did nix flake update, but it did not give me up-to-date nixpkgs | 14:06:06 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | OH GOD github timeouted me | 14:06:16 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | yeah no disregard, not your fault | 14:06:31 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | huh no that wasn't it... Seems i have some flake that pins nixpkgs instead of doign a follows=, this is pain | 14:07:56 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | oh no, its homemanager that is exploding | 14:14:27 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | ugh | 14:14:28 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | HM was a mistake. | 14:15:25 |
 aidalgol | KMyMoney is broken because alkimia has an alias that throws with a message about it being removed.
error: The libsForQt5.alkimia package and the corresponding top-level alkimia alias have been removed, as KDE Gear 5 and Plasma 5 have reached end of life.
But there's an alkimia in top-level/all-packages.nix that uses kdePackages.callPackage, and the alkimia nix source appears to be building against Qt6. So is this alias incorrectly shadowing this definition, or do I need to reference it differently?
| 22:13:51 |
| emily | aliases will shadow all-packages | 22:35:56 |
| emily | where is the alias defined? | 22:36:01 |
