Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
23 Oct 2024 | ||
Khalil Santana | (There's no arch anymore, hasn't been for a few months, this home fs isn't shared anymore) | 17:49:57 |
Khalil Santana | Is there a way to reset all of plasma cosmetic settings? Or do I have to hunt down all of its dotfiles and delete/rename them and restart my session? | 17:51:53 |
aloisw | Even worse, some things are only part of dotfiles (kdeglobals for example). | 17:53:35 |
aloisw | The best approach probably is to try to reset and reapply things that look relevant (here I would do color scheme, application theme). | 17:54:03 |
aktaboot changed their profile picture. | 19:54:04 | |
24 Oct 2024 | ||
Naxdy joined the room. | 07:12:26 | |
jopejoe1 set a profile picture. | 07:35:11 | |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | In reply to @khalil:ksantana.netDon't you have QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME set to something? | 21:24:22 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | i wonder when staging-next will be merged... i'm so tired without kvantum | 21:35:18 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | * i wonder when staging-next will be merged... i'm so tired to live without kvantum | 21:35:34 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | In reply to @ilya-fedin:matrix.orgI also heard about some breeze regression but I thought widgets only. Could be wrong, though. | 21:39:16 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | In reply to @ilya-fedin:matrix.org* I also heard about some breeze regression but I thought it's widgets only. Could be wrong, though. | 21:39:35 |
Khalil Santana | In reply to @ilya-fedin:matrix.orgJust checked, no I do not =/ | 21:53:17 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | In reply to @ilya-fedin:matrix.orgthen perhaps this after all | 21:54:28 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | you can try to switch to fusion to check maybe π€ | 21:54:44 |
Khalil Santana | I think I'll need to rollback to a previous flake.lock really, too much stuff is broken | 21:55:47 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | seems like this is the fix https://invent.kde.org/plasma/breeze/-/commit/a98e7f641ed7fbef2033632333a0b95be5488136 | 21:57:49 |
Khalil Santana | If anybody else has the same issue, this flake.lock is the latest one I have without the issue: (also I don't understand why I have several nixpkgs there if anybody would like to ELI5 me why that happens)
| 22:09:25 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | recursive deps | 22:12:34 |
25 Oct 2024 | ||
K900 | In reply to@ilya-fedin:matrix.orgFWIW it's mostly built for Linuxes now | 04:58:09 |
K900 | So you could run off next directly | 04:58:16 |
K900 | If you're feeling brave | 04:58:26 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | i don't π | 04:59:25 |
K900 | Download {0BCC98C8-FE49-4B00-B787-8471FBBEA6DB}.png | 05:00:23 |
K900 | The current queue situation, for reference | 05:00:29 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | when staging-next gets merged? I haven't seen any mention of the policy in CONTRIBUTING.md and it seemed to me that previous PR was merged before it finished building | 05:11:19 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | * When staging-next gets merged? I haven't seen any mention of the policy in CONTRIBUTING.md and it seemed to me that previous PR was merged before it finished building | 05:11:25 |
K900 | It's a manual operation | 05:12:09 |
πΌπ. π±ππ πππ π π·ππ | In reply to @k900:0upti.mei686-linux | 05:12:15 |
K900 | So usually it's just "whenever we feel it's good enough" | 05:12:18 |