!rGlCMuXgAhgEpdvJUz:nixos.org

NixOS KDE

219 Members
59 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
6 Apr 2026
@elisaado:elisaado.comEli Saado changed their profile picture.11:03:15
@elisaado:elisaado.comEli Saado changed their profile picture.11:04:10
@elisaado:elisaado.comEli Saado changed their profile picture.11:05:03
@mr-qubo:matrix.orgmr-quboIs anyone else trying to use Firefox. On my machine it works very bad. Sometimes freezes for a few minutes and it also slows down entire desktop. Restarting Firefox helps so I have to reatart Firefox every 1-2 dayd. I wonder if it's Nixos or KDE specific issue or these are general problems with Firefox?13:54:59
@mr-qubo:matrix.orgmr-qubo * 14:00:31
@mr-qubo:matrix.orgmr-qubo * 14:02:41
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️No issues here14:03:56
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers [& it/fae]if it's specifically the browser chrome freezing that's a bug fixed in tomorrow's release that affects more than just kde14:07:08
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers [& it/fae]* if it's specifically the browser chrome/menu bar freezing that's a bug fixed in tomorrow's release that affects more than just kde14:07:30
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers [& it/fae] * 14:16:00
@mr-qubo:matrix.orgmr-quboNope, entire browser. KDE makes the window grayed out.14:29:37
@shapr:cofree.coffeeshapr In the KDE settings for "Wi-Fi & Internet" does the connection priority value also affect which interface is the default for network traffic?
My laptop has Wi-Fi and Ethernet, and "Wired Connection" had priority -100 while the Wi-Fi had priority -1.
If I change the Ethernet priority to the highest, will it handle traffic by default?
14:55:25
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️No15:05:49
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️It only affects autoconnect priority15:05:52
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Not route metric15:05:53
@shapr:cofree.coffeeshaprThank you!15:18:06
8 Apr 2026
@bmanuel:matrix.org@bmanuel:matrix.org left the room.03:11:20
10 Apr 2026
@elisaado:elisaado.comEli Saado In kscreenlocker (not PLM/SDDM), when configuring PAM-u2f, the required rules get automatically added to /etc/pam.d/kde-fingerprint and it simply works. However, when the user completes the u2f UV/UIF, kscreenlocker shows an additional "unlock" screen with a single button that says "unlock", which when pressed, unlocks the session.

The fix for this according to the arch wiki (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Universal_2nd_Factor, under SDDM/KDE) is to use /etc/pam.d/kde-fingerprint instead of pam.d/kde (or possibly /etc/pam.d/kde-smartcard according to a reddit thread).

Is there a Nix native way of managing the /etc/pam.d/kde-fingerprint file?
16:29:57
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Those should be configured correctly by default16:32:41
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-unstable/nixos/modules/services/desktop-managers/plasma6.nix#L34416:33:22
@elisaado:elisaado.comEli Saado right, but they are only set if fprintd or p11 are enabled, even though u2f can do biometric things without fprintd.

though reading that source did help me find a solution (so thank you <3),
    services.kde.u2fAuth = false;
    services.kde-fingerprint.u2fAuth = true;

(disabling u2f in the kde service is needed as it has priority over the u2f in the kde-fingerprint service)
16:56:40
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️ It should probably be kde-smartcard 17:00:17
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️ Not kde 17:00:19
@elisaado:elisaado.comEli SaadoI assume you mean kde-smartcard instead of kde-fingerprint17:05:34
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Yes17:08:27
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️But also maybe it should be added to the module17:08:43
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Ugh17:08:44
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️PAM is a fuck17:08:46
@k900:0upti.meK900 ⚡️Maybe we can just rip out PAM before anyone else cares17:09:01
16 Oct 2022
@spacesbot:nixos.devspacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels joined the room.18:01:28

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9