| 15 Oct 2024 |
 K900 ⚡️ | It happens pretty consistently | 06:40:03 |
| K900 ⚡️ | There's a "prerelease" build but the sources for that can disappear at any time | 06:58:59 |
| K900 ⚡️ | So ideally we don't want to ship it | 06:59:06 |
| K900 ⚡️ | But also honestly just let that thing die already | 06:59:16 |
| K900 ⚡️ | PySide is right there, and notably maintained by more than one guy and not sold for $500/seat | 06:59:39 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Merged the tdesktop bump | 08:07:33 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Just PyQt left I think | 08:08:08 |
| K900 ⚡️ | For major Qt 6.8 breakage | 08:08:13 |
| K900 ⚡️ | https://kde.org/announcements/plasma/6/6.2.1/ | 14:22:01 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Ughhhhh | 14:22:04 |
| K900 ⚡️ | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/348812 | 15:31:27 |
 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | Did something happen to the patch picking plugins from PATH? | 21:38:09 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | kvantum doesn't get detected by applications anymore... | 21:38:22 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | hm, /run/current-system/sw/lib/qt-6/plugins is in QT_PLUGIN_PATH so it would work even without the patch. What did happen to kvantum then... | 21:48:41 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | qt 5 applications seem to be ok... | 21:50:51 |
| 16 Oct 2024 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Qt 6.8 maybe | 02:26:55 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Somehow | 02:26:57 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | the weirdest thing is that it doesn't even show in QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS | 12:17:04 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | Looks like Qt doesn't recognize symlinks as plugins anymore | 12:57:35 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | running QT_PLUGIN_PATH=/run/current-system/sw/lib/qt-6/plugins systemsettings doesn't even detect breeze | 12:57:53 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | ls /run/current-system/sw/lib/qt-6/plugins/styles
breeze6.so libkvantum.so
| 12:58:13 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Huh | 12:58:51 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | looks like someone already made a bug report for it
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-130109 | 13:20:43 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | thanks god | 13:20:45 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | I wonder whether the wrapper for binary firefox (I use firefox-beta-bin from the mozilla overlay but it uses the wrapper from nixpkgs iirc) lacks rpath/ld_library_path for libproxy? As firefox doesn't seem to follow KDE proxy settings... | 14:43:30 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | * I wonder whether the wrapper for binary firefox (I use firefox-beta-bin from the mozilla overlay but it uses the wrapper from nixpkgs iirc) lacks rpath/ld_library_path for libproxy? As it doesn't seem to follow KDE proxy settings... | 14:44:49 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | And I wonder whether there's any about:config knob to make it use portal proxy resolver... | 14:46:19 |
| K900 ⚡️ | https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/597856 | 16:06:29 |
| K900 ⚡️ | Fixes the plugins-through-symlinks issue | 16:06:36 |
| 𝙼𝚛. 𝙱𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝙷𝚊𝚝 | In reply to @ilya-fedin:matrix.org
I wonder whether the wrapper for binary firefox (I use firefox-beta-bin from the mozilla overlay but it uses the wrapper from nixpkgs iirc) lacks rpath/ld_library_path for libproxy? As it doesn't seem to follow KDE proxy settings... oh, so they added support for it 15 years ago and broke 9 years ago. lol.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517655
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1220399 | 19:05:35 |
