!rWxyQqNqMUDLECdsIf:blad.is

Poetry2nix

298 Members
https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix | Poetry2nix is unmaintained https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix/issues/186553 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
2 Jan 2024
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

knkski: there are default overrides for  pytorch-lightning  that attempt to handle what must have previously been something like a nested tarball. I removed these from an experimental branch on my fork
and things work as expected when I source it in my flake. I was going to discuss submitting these upstream, but it might be necessary to retain these unpackPhase customizations with version guards for backward compatibility.

I could add these if I knew where things changed, but I didn't manage to bisect where this in the pytorch-lightning release history after trying as far back as 1.9.4 and sporadically downloading a few of the very early source distributions to inspect their structure.

22:48:37
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

knkski: there are default overrides for  pytorch-lightning  that attempt to handle what must have previously been something like a nested tarball. I removed these from an experimental branch on my fork
and things work as expected when I source it in my flake. I was going to discuss submitting these upstream, but it might be necessary to retain these unpackPhase customizations with version guards for backward compatibility.

I could add these if I knew where things changed, but I didn't manage to bisect where that is in the pytorch-lightning release history after trying as far back as 1.9.4 and sporadically downloading a few of the very early source distributions to inspect their structure.

22:49:09
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

knkski: there are default overrides for  pytorch-lightning  that attempt to handle what must have previously been something like a nested tarball. I removed these from an experimental branch on my fork
and things work as expected when I source it in my flake. I was going to discuss submitting these upstream, but it might be necessary to retain these unpackPhase customizations with version guards for backward compatibility.

I could add these if I knew where things changed, but I didn't manage to bisect where that is in the pytorch-lightning release history after trying as far back as 1.9.4 and sporadically downloading a few of the very early source distributions from PyPI to inspect their structure.

22:49:32
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

knkski: there are default overrides for  pytorch-lightning  that attempt to handle what must have previously been something like a nested tarball. I removed these from an experimental branch on my fork and things work as expected when I source it in my flake. I was going to discuss submitting these upstream, but it might be necessary to retain these unpackPhase customizations with version guards for backward compatibility.

I could add these if I knew where things changed, but I didn't manage to bisect where that is in the pytorch-lightning release history after trying as far back as 1.9.4 and sporadically downloading a few of the very early source distributions from PyPI to inspect their structure.

22:50:10
@kennethkoski:matrix.orgknkskiI'll see if I can help bisect exactly where. I do remember that 1.5.3 installed with no issue, and 1.5.4 had some issue. I don't remember if it was the same one though22:50:27
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.orgThat sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time. 22:51:02
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added Oct 31 2022 it should be somewhere in the 1.7.7 to 1.9.4 range.

22:58:15
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added Oct 31 2022 it should be somewhere in the Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 to 1.9.4 range.

22:59:06
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added Oct 31 2022 it should be somewhere in the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the last one 1.9.4 I checked manually.

23:00:06
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in #786 Oct 31 2022 it should be somewhere in the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the last one 1.9.4 I checked manually.

23:00:32
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in #786 Oct 31 2022 it should be somewhere in the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the last one 1.9.4 I checked manually.

23:00:45
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in #786 Oct 31 2022 it should be somewhere in the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the last one, 1.9.4, I checked manually.

23:01:09
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in #786 Oct 31 2022 it should presumably be somewhere in the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the last one, 1.9.4, I checked manually.

23:01:45
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere in the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the last one, 1.9.4, I checked manually.

23:01:58
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere in the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one, March 2 2023 1.9.4, I checked manually.

23:02:56
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere in the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

23:03:35
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere between the release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

23:04:30
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in poetry2nix #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere between the pytorch-lightning release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

23:05:05
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in poetry2nix #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere between the pytorch-lightning release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

Alternatively, there may have been a higher-level change in how the source tarball's are handled in general rendering the unpackPhase unnecessary, even for older versions.

23:11:01
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in poetry2nix #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere between the pytorch-lightning release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

Alternatively, there may have been a higher-level change in how the source tarball's are handled in general rendering this unpackPhase unnecessary, even for older versions.

23:12:10
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in poetry2nix #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere between the pytorch-lightning release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

Alternatively, there may have been a higher-level change in how the source tarball's are handled rendering this unpackPhase unnecessary, even for older versions.

23:12:23
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in poetry2nix #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere between the pytorch-lightning release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

Alternatively, there may have been a higher-level change in how the source tarball's are handled rendering this unpackPhase unnecessary, even for older versions.

Anyway, I put up #1481 to mark the issue.

23:23:33
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in poetry2nix #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere between the pytorch-lightning release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

Alternatively, there may have been a higher-level change in how the source tarball's are handled rendering this unpackPhase unnecessary, even for older versions.

Anyway, I put up poetry2nix #1481 to mark the issue.

23:23:49
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org *

That sounds like a good start. I'll take a look around that time.

Since the unpackPhase was added in poetry2nix #786 Oct 31 2022 the change should presumably be somewhere between the pytorch-lightning release prior to that Sep 22 2022 1.7.7 and the oldest one I checked manually from March 2 2023 in 1.9.4.

Alternatively, there may have been a higher-level change in how the source tarball's are handled rendering this unpackPhase unnecessary, even for older versions.

Anyway, I put up poetry2nix #1481 to mark the issue for further discussion if it is worthwhile.

23:24:12
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org I had a somewhat analogous issue with llvmlite that was resolved by removing the postPatch here
https://github.com/cameronraysmith/poetry2nix/commit/c96a441af982c44776f2e5815001c484a7ffd9d2 because static linking was disabled by default in llvmlite in https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/250
23:45:04
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org * I had a somewhat analogous issue with llvmlite that was resolved by removing the postPatch here
https://github.com/cameronraysmith/poetry2nix/commit/65b57828727fc1698e1aa29007ff46dea66c10b6 because static linking was disabled by default in llvmlite in https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/250
23:49:25
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org * I had a somewhat analogous issue with llvmlite that was resolved by removing the postPatch here
https://github.com/cameronraysmith/poetry2nix/commit/65b57828727fc1698e1aa29007ff46dea66c10b6 because static linking was disabled by default in llvmlite in https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/250 and the string targeted for removal from ffi/Makefile.linux no longer exists
23:55:14
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org * I had a somewhat analogous issue with llvmlite that was resolved by removing the postPatch here
https://github.com/cameronraysmith/poetry2nix/commit/65b57828727fc1698e1aa29007ff46dea66c10b6 because static linking was disabled by default in llvmlite in https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/250 and the associated string targeted for removal from ffi/Makefile.linux no longer exists
23:55:21
3 Jan 2024
@interru:chat.interru.io@interru:chat.interru.io joined the room.03:33:44
@cameronraysmith:matrix.org@cameronraysmith:matrix.org * I had a somewhat analogous issue with llvmlite that was resolved by removing the postPatch here
https://github.com/cameronraysmith/poetry2nix/commit/c20bd27ae4f5d8c9c16a2685b167a7b602a93fea because static linking was disabled by default in llvmlite in https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/250 and the associated string targeted for removal from ffi/Makefile.linux no longer exists
05:27:50

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6