Poetry2nix | 315 Members | |
| https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix | 60 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Dec 2023 | ||
You can work around it with nix develop --impure | 21:48:50 | |
| 8 Dec 2023 | ||
| I'm trying to include the `simplejpeg` package. First I get the ModuleNotFoundError for setuptools, so I add that to the override. Then I get a metadata-generation-failed error. Investigating the log, I find that I have a ModuleNotFoundError for cmake, so I add that also to the override for simplejpeg. However now I get a cmake command not found error... Have anyone met this kind of error before, and have an idea of how to solve it? | 11:31:21 | |
Add cmake to nativeBuildInputs | 11:32:31 | |
In reply to @k900:0upti.me Thanks! Now I first get a cmake warning: Then a cmake error: | 11:46:27 | |
| That sounds like a packaging issue maybe | 11:46:44 | |
| I don't think we wrap cmake? | 11:46:54 | |
| Yeah I suppose, simplejpeg seems pretty obscure... It does compile if I use preferWheels. obviously that is not optimal, but if it works 🤷♂️ | 11:50:19 | |
In reply to @gaivs:matrix.orgWith preferWheels and without the override for simplejpeg ofc | 11:50:47 | |
| 13:09:38 | ||
| 14:38:07 | ||
| 9 Dec 2023 | ||
| 05:18:30 | ||
| 10 Dec 2023 | ||
| When a hash is not in the list, how do you override it? | 21:32:25 | |
| https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix/blob/7249b835c5e08e2ecba2b50cba78f4c7c96eed86/overrides/default.nix#L2932 | 21:32:27 | |
| I've done something like
| 21:32:51 | |
| But I still get the message like
| 21:33:11 | |
| 11 Dec 2023 | ||
In reply to @adis:blad.is Does something like this also looks like a sensible workaround?
| 13:54:16 | |
In reply to @adis:blad.is* Does something like this also looks like a sensible workaround?
| 13:54:54 | |
| 18:05:22 | |
| Does this stuff happen because they replace certain files corresponding to a version release? | 18:06:05 | |
| Oh no, it's because I was maintaining an override and didn't know it :D | 18:06:52 | |
| I see something in a poetry.lock | 20:27:01 | |
optimum = {version = ">=1.13.2,<2.0.0", extras = ["onnxruntime"], optional = true, markers = "extra == \"local-models\""} | 20:27:02 | |
what does optional = true mean, and how can I tell poetry2nix to remove it if it's optional? | 20:27:17 | |
| 12 Dec 2023 | ||
| Redacted or Malformed Event | 02:50:49 | |
In reply to @reivilibre:librepush.nethttps://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=113396 | 04:10:45 | |
In reply to @reivilibre:librepush.net* https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=113396 | 04:11:33 | |
| Does anyone have experience with the sort of issue described in this discussion: https://github.com/orgs/python-poetry/discussions/8781 ? I don't think it really has much to do with poetry2nix even if it's conceivable to patch it in the flake. For more direct access, I reference the flake toward the end of that discussion question. | 13:52:57 | |
| * Does anyone have experience with the sort of issue described in this discussion question: https://github.com/orgs/python-poetry/discussions/8781 ? I don't think it really has much to do with poetry2nix even if it's conceivable to patch it in the flake. For more direct access, I reference the flake toward the end of that discussion question. | 13:54:50 | |
| * Does anyone have experience with the sort of issue described in this discussion question: https://github.com/orgs/python-poetry/discussions/8781 ? I don't think it really has much to do with poetry2nix even if it's conceivable to patch it in the flake. For more direct access, I reference the flake toward the end of that discussion question, but the question has to do with package name normalization in poetry.lock files for packages installed from git source of a package also distributed on PyPI. | 13:56:32 | |
| * Does anyone have experience with the sort of issue described in this discussion question: https://github.com/orgs/python-poetry/discussions/8781 ? I don't think it really has much to do with poetry2nix even if it's conceivable to patch it in the flake. For more direct access, I reference the flake toward the end of that discussion question, but the question has to do with consistency of package name normalization in poetry.lock files for packages installed from git source that are also distributed on PyPI. | 13:57:13 | |