!rWxyQqNqMUDLECdsIf:blad.is

Poetry2nix

304 Members
https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix55 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
17 Apr 2024
@vengmark2:matrix.org@vengmark2:matrix.org Crap, looks like pkgs.awscli2 is overriding something. How can I avoid that? 22:30:53
@vengmark2:matrix.org@vengmark2:matrix.org Filed issue. 22:43:21
18 Apr 2024
@fractivore:cyberia.club@fractivore:cyberia.club left the room.02:25:46
19 Apr 2024
@nirudium:matrix.orgnirudiumHow could I use pypy with a poetry2nix flake? 23:32:38
20 Apr 2024
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland Coeurjoly joined the room.14:50:15
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland Coeurjoly
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.org
  1. Absolutely. There are far too many packages for any individual to keep track of all the non-Python dependencies and missing dependencies.
  2. Generally, yes, but if that's too much work simply having the dependencies at all is better than not having them.
  3. If you can, that would be great. Splitting your work into multiple PRs would be appreciated, though, since the difficulty of reviewing scales by something like O(N²) for N lines.

Questions about buildSystem:

"urllib3": [
"setuptools",
{
"buildSystem": "flit-core",
"until": "2.0.2"
},
{
"buildSystem": "hatchling",
"from": "2.0.2"
}
],

15:22:51
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland Coeurjoly
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.org
  1. Absolutely. There are far too many packages for any individual to keep track of all the non-Python dependencies and missing dependencies.
  2. Generally, yes, but if that's too much work simply having the dependencies at all is better than not having them.
  3. If you can, that would be great. Splitting your work into multiple PRs would be appreciated, though, since the difficulty of reviewing scales by something like O(N²) for N lines.
* Questions about buildSystem:
Given the following:
"urllib3": [
"setuptools",
{
"buildSystem": "flit-core",
"until": "2.0.2"
},
{
"buildSystem": "hatchling",
"from": "2.0.2"
}
],
15:23:12
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland Coeurjoly *

Questions about buildSystem:
Given the following:
"urllib3": [
"setuptools",
{
"buildSystem": "flit-core",
"until": "2.0.2"
},
{
"buildSystem": "hatchling",
"from": "2.0.2"
}
],

If I build 2.0.2, does it pull setuptools too?

15:23:51
@k900:0upti.meK900Yes15:25:18
@k900:0upti.meK900It needs to be set with until and/or from to be conditional15:25:28
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland Coeurjoly
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
It needs to be set with until and/or from to be conditional

Thanks.
Also, if I have

"my_package": [
{
"buildSystem": "flit-core",
"from": "2.0.1"
},
{
"buildSystem": "hatchling",
"from": "2.0.2"
}
],

If I build 2.0.2, does it pull flit-core?

15:30:46
@k900:0upti.meK900Yes15:31:04
@k900:0upti.meK900None of those are exclusive15:31:09
@k900:0upti.meK900Every item is checked completely separately15:31:14
@k900:0upti.meK900And added if it applies15:31:17
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland Coeurjolygreat, thank you.16:11:32
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland CoeurjolyI just pushed a PR fixing one of the failling tests, git-deps16:11:52
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland Coeurjolythere are now 15 failing tests, from 1616:12:25
21 Apr 2024
@rolandco:matrix.orgRoland CoeurjolyAnd some other PRs too, let me know if there is any question07:42:36
22 Apr 2024
@malteneuss:matrix.org@malteneuss:matrix.org joined the room.06:20:57
@malteneuss:matrix.org@malteneuss:matrix.org Ah i just found this dedicated room. At my company we are trying out Nix with our Python services and a few people are struggling with some areas of poetry2nix. That's why i decided to improve the documentation:
K900
Do you who know i can ping for some documentation improvement MRs for poetry2nix like https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix/pull/1600 Maybe you? adisbladis seems to be busy, and i couldn't find any other listed maintainer.
06:23:59
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan @ 39c3 (DECT 94667 or 97340 or 67192)This should probably get a merge https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix/pull/160020:13:57
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan @ 39c3 (DECT 94667 or 97340 or 67192)Actually, this code doesn't work in flakes.21:34:36
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan @ 39c3 (DECT 94667 or 97340 or 67192)https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix/blob/master/vendor/pyproject.nix/fetchers/default.nix#L112-L11621:34:50
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan @ 39c3 (DECT 94667 or 97340 or 67192)
      pathParts = filter ({ prefix, path }: "NETRC" == prefix) nixPath; # deadnix: skip
      netrc_file =
        if (pathParts != [ ])
        then (head pathParts).path
        else "";
21:34:59
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan @ 39c3 (DECT 94667 or 97340 or 67192) netrc_file is always "" because nixPath is always [] in pure-eval 21:35:17
@niklauzg:matrix.org@niklauzg:matrix.org left the room.23:53:48
23 Apr 2024
@gsaurel:laas.frnim65s changed their display name from Guilhem to nim65s.07:52:33
@truh:matrix.orgtruhDoes it need to be that strict in fixed output derivations? Private git repos work too.09:49:56
@malteneuss:matrix.org@malteneuss:matrix.org
In reply to @matthewcroughan:defenestrate.it
netrc_file is always "" because nixPath is always [] in pure-eval

Thanks for the feedback. The Nix flake variant indeed was missing in my PR. I added a few paragraphs how to add env vars to the nix-daemon (i think this is the only working way for flakes). Could you take a look again?

btw, thanks for your awesome talks on Nix for Docker (the main reason my company is willing to try Nix) and for Riscv.

19:55:13

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6