!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

108 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: https://ofborg.org/prometheus/graph?g0.expr=ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting&g0.tab=1&g0.stacked=0&g0.show_exemplars=0&g0.range_input=2h&g1.expr=ofborg_queue_builder_waiting%7Barch!~%22.*-lowprior%22%7D&g1.tab=1&g1.stacked=0&g1.show_exemplars=0&g1.range_input=2h43 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
8 Apr 2023
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
Eval queue should get eaten through fairly fast. The evals themselves may be slow but the machines are fast enough that it shouldn't ever grow to an unmanageable number (unlike the Darwin build queues lol)
Yeah not unmanageable. It was just getting pretty slow to start evaluating PRs yesterday and the day before (but it did eventually catch up)
17:38:41
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterJust wanted to avoid the cost if I easily could but it's not that big of a deal. Thank you though!17:40:54
@noob_tea:matrix.orgtea joined the room.18:09:26
@wentasah:matrix.orgwentasah joined the room.20:57:16
@matthewp:matrix.orgMatthew joined the room.21:59:02
@zowoq:matrix.orgzowoq left the room.23:10:58
9 Apr 2023
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaRedacted or Malformed Event13:26:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaRedacted or Malformed Event13:26:14
@me:indeednotjames.comEmily joined the room.14:45:16
@me:indeednotjames.comEmily

logs.nix.ci no longer resolves for me 👀

❯ dig @1.1.1.1 A log.nix.ci

; <<>> DiG 9.18.8 <<>> @1.1.1.1 A log.nix.ci
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 43105
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;log.nix.ci.			IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ci.			7200	IN	SOA	ns.nic.ci. hostmaster.ns.nic.ci. 2023041183 480 300 1209600 7200

;; Query time: 53 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Apr 09 16:46:02 CEST 2023
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 93
14:46:30
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinSee yesterday discussion 14:47:15
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin* See yesterdays discussion 14:47:25
@me:indeednotjames.comEmily
In reply to @artturin:matrix.org
See yesterdays discussion
oh, my bad. ty
14:47:52
@me:indeednotjames.comEmily *

logs.nix.ci no longer resolves for me 👀

❯ dig @1.1.1.1 A logs.nix.ci

; <<>> DiG 9.18.8 <<>> @1.1.1.1 A logs.nix.ci
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 43105
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;logs.nix.ci.			IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ci.			7200	IN	SOA	ns.nic.ci. hostmaster.ns.nic.ci. 2023041183 480 300 1209600 7200

;; Query time: 53 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Apr 09 16:46:02 CEST 2023
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 93
14:48:34
10 Apr 2023
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe logviewer still wants to read from logs.nix.ci13:20:59
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa

Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://logs.nix.ci/logs/nixos/nixpkgs.225507. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed). Status code: (null).

13:21:11
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h...right, cuz the repo for that is separate from ofborg itself. OK, one moment.13:22:05
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hTry now?13:24:53
@k900:0upti.meK900Can we make ofborg scream if a PR with, say, 2000 or more rebuilds targets master? 13:26:11
@k900:0upti.meK900Preferably in a way that blocks merging13:26:39
@k900:0upti.meK900Or at least makes the button scary13:26:49
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hofborg does not block merging. It's only guidance, because it's not always 100% correct.13:27:05
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hI would think that the big red "1000+ rebuilds" labels would already kinda make the button scary though, no?13:27:25
@k900:0upti.meK900No one sees those if there's like 100 comments 13:27:45
@k900:0upti.meK900And the merge button is at the bottom 13:27:51
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/218331 happened earlier today13:28:41
@k900:0upti.meK900We already have a check that fails when you try to target a channel branch 13:29:39
@k900:0upti.meK900Would be nice to have something like that for staging13:29:57
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h While not ideal, I don't necessarily want to give PRs a big red X (a failed status check) unless something is broken. 13:30:41
@k900:0upti.meK900Well github doesn't exactly have a warning state13:31:24

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6