| 5 Apr 2024 |
|  superherointj changed their display name from superherointj 💥 to superherointj 👨💻. | 13:47:24 |
| superherointj changed their display name from superherointj 👨💻 to superherointj 🐴. | 13:48:49 |
| 6 Apr 2024 |
| superherointj changed their display name from superherointj 🐴 to superherointj. | 15:25:17 |
| 8 Apr 2024 |
|  @a-n-n-a-l-e-e:matrix.org left the room. | 23:11:13 |
| 10 Apr 2024 |
 7c6f434c | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/302937 — uhm. I am not 100% sure «by: package-maintainer» should be set in this specific case, and definitely «by: package-maintainer» while not mentioning the previous maintainer is unfortunate. Am I missing something?
(For the record: I approve of the changes in the PR and of the change in maintainer list, I just think it should be labelled/review-requested differently) | 14:37:24 |
 emily | eval fails for (what looks like) all new PRs with https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/455a82c8ebc61cdd44e3a3f5c31502ea and I can't make out what caused this 👀 | 19:19:31 |
| emily | (eval using nixpkgs-review is not failing) | 19:21:06 |
 Lily Foster | i'm trying to investigate but trying to search through recent nixpkgs PRs is giving me 500 errors on github... (yayyyy) | 19:22:36 |
 cole-h | I don't know why, but https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/303150 makes me kinda suspicious | 19:22:55 |
 Artturin | merge seems to match the beginning of errors | 19:23:45 |
| cole-h | (didn't wait for ofborg statuses so I can't be certain yet, bogarting one of the ofborg machines to trial an eval with that reverted) | 19:25:06 |
 K900 | Oh god | 19:26:07 |
| K900 | Does it trigger some weird Darwin codepath somewhere | 19:26:14 |
