| 25 Jul 2022 |
 Sandro | you don't need to post every here, we can just give the bot a kick in the bot. | 08:55:37 |
| Sandro | * you don't need to post every here, we can just give the bot a kick in the but. | 08:55:41 |
 cole-h | Yep, I do actually check them every once in a while... Usually just the GitHub API sending incomplete responses :')
I appreciate the assistance though. | 14:21:24 |
 Winter (she/her) | anyone know why OfBorg would either fail to find the changed attributes, or not find the maintainers on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/182884? | 22:59:08 |
| 26 Jul 2022 |
|  @tinybronca:sibnsk.net changed their display name from tinybronca to tailrec. | 14:49:21 |
| @tinybronca:sibnsk.net changed their display name from tailrec to tinybronca. | 15:43:51 |
| 27 Jul 2022 |
|  @ninjatrappeur:alternativebit.fr joined the room. | 17:43:21 |
| Winter (she/her) | does OfBorg not eval anything with hydraPlatforms = [] or something? it didn't detect any changed attrs for this PR | 18:50:19 |
| Winter (she/her) | oh maybe it doesn't eval for binaryNativeCode? | 18:55:12 |
| Winter (she/her) | i think i'm making up a reason lol | 18:55:46 |
| 28 Jul 2022 |
| Winter (she/her) | tangibly related, in this PR, OfBorg detected changed paths, but no maintainers (even though these packages have maintainers)
although in this case it's actually a good thing since it would be review spam for no reason since it's not directly related to any of these packages, it still seems weird that it wasn't able to identify a single maintainer...?
| 03:59:52 |
| 30 Jul 2022 |
| Sandro changed their display name from Sandro to Sandro 🐧. | 13:17:05 |
| 1 Aug 2022 |
|  @better_sleeping:converser.eu joined the room. | 09:12:28 |
| @better_sleeping:converser.eu left the room. | 09:12:46 |
| 12 Aug 2022 |
| Winter (she/her) | How was OfBorg able to eval this PR perfectly fine, when it... doesn't eval? The change involves NixOS options so at least that eval should've failed, no? Or am I missing something obvious...? Thanks. | 15:55:46 |
| cole-h | It does eval, it doesn't build. | 16:12:52 |
| Winter (she/her) | How does it eval if the function doesn't exist? | 16:14:00 |
| cole-h | Because the docs are lazy now | 16:14:09 |
| Winter (she/her) | Oh | 16:14:18 |
| Winter (she/her) | riiight. | 16:14:31 |
| Winter (she/her) | 😅 | 16:14:47 |
| cole-h | But that just means ofborg should probably also build the manual / options, instead of just evaluating it, maybe... I don't remember if there's a reason we didn't do that in the first place; I'll ask Graham. | 16:15:35 |
| Winter (she/her) | Probably because it takes a bit? | 16:20:48 |
| cole-h | Not that long, on my machine:
/nix/store/16qqh8nswwsj7ic59af9xypk2y46gn62-options.json
user=0.80s system=0.25s cpu=16% total=6.393
| 16:22:53 |
| cole-h | (and the ofborg builders are beefier) | 16:23:07 |
| Winter (she/her) | Yeah it probably got better thanks to pennae's work | 16:24:10 |
| Winter (she/her) | Maybe it was initially disabled for that reason | 16:24:19 |
| 17 Aug 2022 |
 trofi | Trying to decipher ofborg failure and failing: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/187157 . Why does eval fail? Is there an expression I could try to get the same failure? | 19:38:28 |
 Artturin | In reply to @trofi:matrix.org
Trying to decipher ofborg failure and failing: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/187157 . Why does eval fail? Is there an expression I could try to get the same failure? Ofborg readme has it | 19:44:34 |
| trofi | Ah, nice. Trying https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/blob/released/README.md#how-does-ofborg-call-nix-instantiate | 19:46:15 |
