| 23 May 2022 |
|  Vladimír Čunát joined the room. | 19:52:42 |
 cole-h | I don't recall if maintainer pings and rebuild amounts are related, so that may not necessarily be true? | 23:21:36 |
| 24 May 2022 |
 7c6f434c | Flightgear example seems to imply it is | 04:09:21 |
| 26 May 2022 |
 hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/174718 triggered package: new, while I only work on an existing package 😲 | 12:57:13 |
| 28 May 2022 |
|  bdd joined the room. | 04:19:27 |
| 7c6f434c | Silly question: does ofBorg evaluate all the passthru attributes in eval check? | 16:03:52 |
| 7c6f434c | Context: updateScript where version and source hash get evaluation-time impurely parsed (by builtins.match) from builtins.fetchurl without hash, then spliced into the script code. | 16:06:35 |
| 7c6f434c | Hm, source suggests no, but still unsure | 16:46:54 |
|  dotlambda joined the room. | 22:38:52 |
| 29 May 2022 |
| 7c6f434c | cole-h: would it be a good idea if eval-check evaluated updateScript, too? | 19:08:40 |
| 4 Jun 2022 |
| bdd set a profile picture. | 20:03:16 |
| 5 Jun 2022 |
 Sandro | somehow aarch64-darwin is missing from the CI run at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/176351
Didn't see that one before | 11:07:34 |
| Sandro | I think that is a general problem right now | 11:11:45 |
| 6 Jun 2022 |
 @grahamc:nixos.org | cole-h: this'd let us netboot the ofborg builders: https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-netboot-serve/pull/12 | 01:57:04 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | using approles' pull authentication: https://learn.hashicorp.com/tutorials/vault/approle?in=vault/auth-methods | 01:58:15 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | (Though there are some minor flaws) | 02:22:59 |
| 7c6f434c | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/176498 @cole-h fresh «CI fine, no auto review request» | 06:44:38 |
| 7c6f434c | * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/176498 fresh «CI fine, no auto review request» | 06:44:39 |
| 7c6f434c | cole-h: failed to ping you from the first try… | 06:44:39 |
| cole-h | Thanks for the ping. Nothing out of the ordinary in the logs, so I'll need to PR something to augment the logging there and see if I can't catch why it's happening. | 17:36:56 |
| 7c6f434c | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/176563/checks?check_run_id=6758559111 Erm. Is gcc supposed to be able to say that? | 19:36:37 |
| 7 Jun 2022 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/176646 touches mailcap and buildcatrust | 01:31:32 |
| hexa | https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/f1f14001951cb28d01e570084f25e237 | 01:31:43 |
| hexa | Maintainers:
magenbluten: rocksdb_6_23, rocksdb_6_23, rocksdb_6_23, rocksdb_6_23
mweinelt: ansible, ansible_2_12, ansible, ansible_2_12, ansible_2_12, ansible_2_12, ansible, ansible
globin: promtail, promtail, promtail, promtail
kalbasit: promtail, promtail, promtail, promtail
c0bw3b: mailcap, mailcap, mailcap, mailcap
mmahut: promtail, promtail, promtail, promtail
supersandro2000: libgit2_1_3_0, libgit2_1_3_0, libgit2_1_3_0, libgit2_1_3_0
adevress: rocksdb_6_23, rocksdb_6_23, rocksdb_6_23, rocksdb_6_23
willibutz: promtail, promtail, promtail, promtail
| 01:31:56 |
| hexa | and then
@ofborg ofborg bot requested review from mweinelt and SuperSandro2000 6 minutes ago
| 01:32:18 |
| Sandro | Is our aliases code seriously broken or the ofborg check?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/176723 | 14:58:54 |
| cole-h | Could you say more...? | 15:08:00 |
| Sandro | The ofborg check which checks for aliases is green but we are clearly using aliases in the tree. I know that this happens for unfree packages which already got tried to fix multiple times but there are also free packages in there and modules. | 15:12:46 |
| Sandro | Maybe this is also dead code but I would expect ofborg to catch such cases. Maybe we need to evaluate the entire documentation? | 15:13:27 |
 Alyssa Ross | sandro: I don't think that's an OfBorg problem, really — the code in NixOS modules is largely conditional on module options, so to be guaranteed to catch aliasing violations you'd have to evaluate every possible combination of NixOS options | 15:29:22 |
