!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

181 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: https://nix.ci/prometheus/graph?g0.expr=ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting&g0.tab=1&g0.stacked=0&g0.show_exemplars=0&g0.range_input=2h&g1.expr=ofborg_queue_builder_waiting%7Barch!~%22.*-lowprior%22%7D&g1.tab=1&g1.stacked=0&g1.show_exemplars=0&g1.range_input=1w63 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
19 Mar 2022
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa

fatal: couldn't find remote ref pull/164601/head

o_O

14:09:02
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hOh boy...17:45:39
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h Ah, found the real issue:
This SHA and context has reached the maximum number of statuses.
17:50:38
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawhat does that even mean17:52:12
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hIt likely means, when GitHub was having their bad day, that the API was doing weird things and caused ofborg to continuously attempt to add statuses or something17:53:14
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hhttps://api.github.com/repos/NixOS/nixpkgs/statuses/4e07eedf4dc9dbba87d3591271d158ceb9341f03?per_page=10017:56:15
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h
: ~ ; curl -v "https://api.github.com/repos/NixOS/nixpkgs/statuses/4e07eedf4dc9dbba87d3591271d158ceb9341f03?per_page=1" 2>&1 | rg -i 'link:'
< link: <https://api.github.com/repositories/4542716/statuses/4e07eedf4dc9dbba87d3591271d158ceb9341f03?per_page=1&page=2>; rel="next", <https://api.github.com/repositories/4542716/statuses/4e07eedf4dc9dbba87d3591271d158ceb9341f03?per_page=1&page=1167>; rel="last"
17:57:23
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hSo that commit has ~1167 statuses on it lol17:57:36
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hThis same thing happened in the past, and I sent in a support ticket and got the above hint to look for how it's exceeding the maximum number of statuses (1000)17:59:31
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h hexa: Fetching from the pull head ref should work now :) 18:00:57
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa❤️18:03:45
23 Mar 2022
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧
In reply to @7c6f434c:nitro.chat
Graham has said many times (and correctly), that even a relatively low rate of false-positive-red will devalue red for very clear failures. Build test failures… vary in their expected impact on decisions
and how often to we muss grey checks by accident and break things?
10:56:12

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6