| 24 Feb 2024 |
 hexa | maybe, maybe not | 14:59:54 |
| 25 Feb 2024 |
|  Simon Menke set a profile picture. | 15:25:56 |
| 28 Feb 2024 |
 Alyssa Ross | Could we have higher darwin timeouts for staging PRs, or something? OfBorg Darwin is basically completely useless on staging PRs, because it can never get past LLVM, which takes >3600 seconds to build. | 14:17:09 |
| hexa | I think we're more affected by the sheer lack of build capacity for aarch64-darwin than its timeouts | 14:19:39 |
| hexa | but yeah, I've seen it often fail on llvm for … basically anything staging | 14:20:11 |
| Alyssa Ross | well, currently we're wasting a lot of that capacity on LLVM builds that are never going to finish | 14:20:39 |
| hexa | true | 14:20:46 |
| Alyssa Ross | so if we can't get more capacity, maybe we should just turn OfBorg Darwin off for staging | 14:21:03 |
| Alyssa Ross | since it's just wasting more than an hour of build time per PR, and is basically guaranteed not to produce any useful result | 14:21:31 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | there was some discussion above about moving to all aarch64 builders and running x86 on those instead, but i don't think any changes were made | 14:21:32 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | (not that that helps this specific timeout, but potentially it helps overall capacity) | 14:23:00 |
 Lily Foster | yeah increasing the timeout may help that problem for sure. we could just try it and see | 14:23:22 |
| hexa | 5x x86_64-linux, 1x aarch64-linux, 2x aarch64-darwin, 3x x86_64-darwin | 14:23:24 |
| hexa | *
- 5x x86_64-linux,
- 1x aarch64-linux,
- 2x aarch64-darwin,
- 3x x86_64-darwin
| 14:23:46 |
| hexa | *
- 5 x86_64-linux,
- 1 aarch64-linux,
- 2 aarch64-darwin,
- 3 x86_64-darwin
| 14:23:51 |
