| 21 Dec 2022 |
 cole-h | Currently deploying the force checkout PR and reviewing the rest | 21:03:44 |
| 22 Dec 2022 |
| cole-h | Just deployed the 22.11 bump. Gonna baby it for a bit before I look at merging the no-url-literals PR | 16:45:50 |
| cole-h | Seems to be working fine. Gonna make that stick and then merge the no-url-literals PR. | 18:49:17 |
| cole-h | no-url-literals deployed | 19:48:18 |
| 23 Dec 2022 |
 Artturin | thanks | 18:06:40 |
| 25 Dec 2022 |
|  rh left the room. | 10:36:15 |
| 29 Dec 2022 |
 Winter (she/her) | How long should I wait to do another @ofborg eval if nothing has happened in 5 minutes and the PR was opened 3 hours ago and OfBorg didn't catch it then either? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/208260 | 21:58:42 |
| Winter (she/her) | Or would trying to trigger it again not do anything potentially? | 21:59:01 |
| Winter (she/her) | There we go. | 22:00:03 |
| Winter (she/her) | Guess it was backed up. | 22:00:19 |
| 30 Dec 2022 |
 piegames | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/207170#issuecomment-1367878166 "Server error" | 11:53:14 |
| piegames | Oh, is GitHub actions actually the same thing as OfBorg? Or should I ping somebody else? | 11:53:46 |
 @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl | GitHub actions is something else. | 12:01:22 |
 Vladimír Čunát | This looks like coming from the backport action. | 12:01:50 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I don't know... the backport action just seems to suffer from duplicate runs sometimes. And those additional runs fail in some ways (but first ones succeed). | 12:08:43 |
 7c6f434c | Sometimes duplicate runs also succeed, though | 12:09:04 |
| 31 Dec 2022 |
 hexa | ofborg fails to resolve foss.heptapod.net in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/208232 | 16:35:34 |
| hexa | see https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/1a00090d6aacdb87903de3e2e4aebe45 | 16:35:39 |
| hexa | can someone flush the dns cache please? 😄 | 16:36:36 |
 trofi | Sounds suspiciously similar to https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/22492 | 16:58:44 |
| trofi | I would suggest re-host patches via github if possible :) | 16:59:41 |
| hexa | better suggestion: don't rely on resolved for dnssec validation | 19:47:23 |
| hexa | unbound validates this domain just fine | 19:47:43 |
| hexa | https://dnsviz.net/d/foss.heptapod.net/dnssec/ | 19:49:47 |
| hexa | looks fine to me | 19:50:09 |
| trofi | It works today for me as well. I closed upstream bug. | 19:55:16 |
| 1 Jan 2023 |
 Sandro 🐧 | resolvectl is wonky anyway especially with DNSSEC | 00:14:15 |
| hexa | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
better suggestion: don't rely on resolved for dnssec validation rephrasing this statement | 01:34:24 |
| 10 Jan 2023 |
| Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/208614#issuecomment-1377643899 | 17:59:40 |
| Artturin | works locally though | 17:59:46 |
