| 15 Jul 2022 |
 Artturin | which one | 20:23:49 |
 hexa | the version bump | 20:27:02 |
| hexa | where I add the exclusiongroup dependency | 20:27:12 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/8437fff66de36d91f0975c35b96d7c4c056ff748 | 20:30:24 |
| hexa | * Artturin: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/8437fff66de36d91f0975c35b96d7c4c056ff748 | 20:30:32 |
| hexa | I can see the infinite recursion when trying to build awsebclì | 20:33:30 |
| hexa | but not by building one of its dependencies 🙂 | 20:33:42 |
| Artturin | thats the last evaluating file in nix-eval-jobs
nix-eval-jobs . --debug | 20:34:37 |
| Artturin | * thats the last evaluating file in nix-eval-jobs https://github.com/nix-community/nix-eval-jobs
nix-eval-jobs . --debug | 20:34:42 |
| hexa | the awsebcli one? | 20:35:54 |
| hexa | hm ok | 20:40:50 |
| Artturin | hexa: commenting this line https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/4a9060f8085dacc6c127af3fe0761396423b714d/pkgs/tools/virtualization/awsebcli/default.nix#L25 fixes the recursion | 20:43:25 |
| hexa | hrm | 20:43:56 |
| hexa | thanks, I don't understand what's going on 😄 | 20:45:57 |
 Sandro | dependency hell 🔥 | 21:22:46 |
| 16 Jul 2022 |
|  symphorien joined the room. | 11:59:14 |
| 20 Jul 2022 |
 Winter (she/her) | I've been waiting on an aarch64-darwin builder for over a day. Is it possible this PR just got missed, or are the queues that backed up? | 02:10:33 |
| Winter (she/her) | (If the former, how would I kickstart building again? @ofborg build?) | 02:10:57 |
| Winter (she/her) | Thanks! | 02:11:14 |
 cole-h | It's possible it was submitted while the Darwin builders were unresponsive. Feel free to `ofborg build` it. Let me know if that still doesn't work (along with the PR number) and I'll take a look. | 03:26:59 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
It's possible it was submitted while the Darwin builders were unresponsive. Feel free to `ofborg build` it. Let me know if that still doesn't work (along with the PR number) and I'll take a look. Will do, thanks. For future reference, how long should I wait until assuming something went wrong, is a day a good time? | 03:32:16 |
| Winter (she/her) | I ask since it seems like a bunch of PRs are stuck in the queue, going back at least 2 days, for just aarch64-darwin. | 03:36:06 |
| Winter (she/her) | So maybe it's a more wide spread issue? Either that or the queue is very backed up. | 03:36:33 |
| cole-h | Darwin is just a pain 😓 I don't know if there's a good smell test, but if you think something is wrong, there's a chance somebody else thinks the same. Ping me all the same, and I'll look into it as soon as I can | 03:45:28 |
| cole-h | But there was an issue earlier last week where nix was stuck for whatever reason, so it's possible the PRs were submitted in that period where the builders were borked | 03:46:08 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to @cole-h:matrix.org
But there was an issue earlier last week where nix was stuck for whatever reason, so it's possible the PRs were submitted in that period where the builders were borked I'm finding PRs up to 5 days ago stuck on aarch64-darwin, do you mind making sure things aren't stuck? I haven't seen aarch64-darwin (relatively quickly) pass in a few days, at least on my PRs + the open ones I just scrolled through. | 03:54:41 |
| cole-h | Unfortunately, I'm about to sit down to dinner -- however, Prometheus shows at least 1 darwin arm builder up at the moment, so new PRs at least should get picked up... I'll check tomorrow morning, though. | 04:06:26 |
| Winter (she/her) | Sounds good, thank you! I'll keep an eye on newly opened PRs to see if anyone makes it through the queue... | 04:07:31 |
| Winter (she/her) | Sorry for barging in with another question, but why would OfBorg request kalbasit's review for this PR, which only adds a new package (and doesn't touch anything they maintain)? There's no force pushes so it's not a PR that added accidentally added commits that modified their stuff or anything, so I'm not really sure why else it would be doing that. | 04:31:03 |
| Artturin | In reply to @winterqt:nixos.dev
Sorry for barging in with another question, but why would OfBorg request kalbasit's review for this PR, which only adds a new package (and doesn't touch anything they maintain)? There's no force pushes so it's not a PR that added accidentally added commits that modified their stuff or anything, so I'm not really sure why else it would be doing that. It uses buildGoModule which adds kalbasit to maintainers | 04:32:05 |
