!sBfrWMVsLoSyFTCkNv:nixos.org

OfBorg

183 Members
Number of builds and evals in queue: https://ofborg.org/prometheus/graph?g0.expr=ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting&g0.tab=1&g0.stacked=0&g0.show_exemplars=0&g0.range_input=2h&g1.expr=ofborg_queue_builder_waiting%7Barch!~%22.*-lowprior%22%7D&g1.tab=1&g1.stacked=0&g1.show_exemplars=0&g1.range_input=2h63 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Mar 2022
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin cole-h: 23:21:32
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h Does that affect pythonX.pkgs.pkgname? 23:22:23
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h e.g. will ofborg now skip python3.pkgs.asdf: 1.1.1 -> 1.2.1 23:22:52
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-h* e.g. will ofborg now skip `python3.pkgs.asdf: 1.1.1 -> 1.2.1`?23:22:56
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinNo23:24:15
@cole-h:matrix.orgcole-hThen seems fine to me.23:24:28
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinShould we merge and test?23:24:45
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinIdk if there's a performance penalty23:25:03
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/165994/checks?check_run_id=571164758723:25:36
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin hexa: im testing if a performance penalty can be avoided with dontRecurseIntoAttrs 23:39:47
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaright23:39:58
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe whole thing should wait for fridhs approval 23:40:07
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinpython3Packages dont currently show up in nixos search because it references python3.packages without recursing23:40:53
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinwhile python39Packages recurses23:40:57
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinso it shows in the search23:41:06
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawe recurse into the attrsets that hydra is supposed to build23:41:21
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin(AFAIU btw)23:41:37
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathat is usually two releases in parallel (currently 3.9/3.10)23:41:53
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand python3Packages is really just the convenience alias to track the latest attrset23:42:15
28 Mar 2022
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinalright no performance impact now https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/165994/checks?check_run_id=571275389200:03:30
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin hexa: how about this commit message 00:08:07
@ryantm:matrix.orgryantmIs it okay to increase the r-ryantm staging/master target cutoff from 100 to 500? https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update/pull/30001:42:05
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayes, 500 is the general number where we do the cut-off these days01:49:55
@hexa:lossy.networkhexagoing with 500-100 is the exception, when you know the rebuild is small anyway01:50:37
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * going with 500-1000 is the exception, when you know the rebuild is small anyway01:51:00
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa
In reply to @artturin:matrix.org
hexa: how about this commit message
will take a look after sleeping
02:14:36
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinI'll merge it and test if it even works If it doesn't I'll test something else 02:17:14
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturindidn't work, another test https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/16602903:20:28
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturina another option would be to special case python3Packages in ofborg03:42:26
29 Mar 2022
@FRidh:matrix.orgFRidh joined the room.08:31:42

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6