| 22 May 2021 |
|  hexa joined the room. | 17:22:59 |
|  7c6f434c joined the room. | 17:25:13 |
|  colemickens joined the room. | 17:26:40 |
|  Alyssa Ross joined the room. | 18:01:56 |
 andi- | Another week another attempt at getting the GitHub Actions CI to pass on my PR.. | 21:40:08 |
| andi- | Still failing on the same weird issue. | 21:48:04 |
| 23 May 2021 |
|  lukegb (he/him) joined the room. | 00:34:07 |
| lukegb (he/him) changed their display name from lukegb to lukegb (he/him). | 01:33:10 |
|  sumner joined the room. | 04:51:57 |
|  V joined the room. | 11:36:33 |
 @grahamc:nixos.org | we should probably move back some of the thinsg ofborg already does to ofborg | 12:37:42 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | like labels | 12:37:43 |
| andi- | Is that on the back of the API rate limit (rather than in principle it should be ofborg doing it)? | 12:40:51 |
 Sandro 🐧 | In reply to @grahamc:nixos.org
like labels Then you need to deploy it everytime something is changed | 12:49:35 |
| Sandro 🐧 | On the other hand actions have regularly problems and issues | 12:50:28 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | API rate limit, I don't feel very precious about the code in ofborg | 12:52:18 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | also I'd be happy to expand merge and deployment rights | 12:52:36 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | gotta run, I'm doing airport stuff today, so I'll be afk for several hours | 12:53:20 |
| andi- | More features into ofborg would really be nice. There was some discussion a out code owners recently. You can't use groups right now as the group requires write access to be mentioned. This would be something ofborg could do as well. It would allow maintainers to be pinged without them having commit access. | 12:54:19 |
| Sandro 🐧 | If it would require a redeploy for every change it would be a hassle | 12:56:00 |
| andi- | It depends on the kind of change. For the code owners example it should be based off the repo checkout and not some config file. | 12:57:28 |
| lukegb (he/him) | Right, there's no reason that parts of the ofborg config couldn't be in the main nixpkgs repo | 13:36:33 |
| lukegb (he/him) | especially if it's just a json file read off master | 13:36:42 |
| andi- | I was more thinking about implementing the same codeowner format that GitHub already users | 13:42:29 |
| andi- | That would allow us to overcome the shortcomings of GitHubs implementation while only maintaining one file. | 13:42:51 |
| andi- | I know that @piegames:matrix.org has run into that issue lately. | 13:43:51 |
| andi- | (now would be a nice time to throw an invite to the channel to that person...) | 13:44:10 |
| Sandro 🐧 | https://matrix.to/#/#ofborg:nixos.org | 13:45:20 |
 cole-h | Redeploying for every change isn't really a hassle ;)
That said, I think using the tag config inside Nixpkgs itself is a good idea. | 16:05:29 |
| Alyssa Ross | I had a WIP branch for that | 16:06:22 |
