| 6 Nov 2021 |
 r-burns | But this wasn't happening before, right? Or were we just not aware of it | 00:56:14 |
 cole-h | It's the first I'm hearing of it, at least. | 00:59:22 |
| cole-h | And indeed, it succeeded building on that ofborg machine... | 01:06:05 |
| cole-h | btw, thanks for prompting me to look at that, Ryan Burns -- it's on my radar at the very least. Hopefully it doesn't appear too often (if ever again...) | 01:21:42 |
| cole-h | It happened again on that PR. I told ofborg to do it again. I'll keep telling it to do it again until it doesn't fail. Much better than actually figuring out what went wrong... | 02:51:26 |
| cole-h | (I'm kidding, but I don't have the brain-bandwidth available to troubleshoot at the moment...) | 02:54:24 |
|  Tseb joined the room. | 09:19:29 |
| Tseb left the room. | 09:25:13 |
| 11 Nov 2021 |
|  EdLin joined the room. | 07:46:22 |
| EdLin left the room. | 08:03:30 |
|  NinjaTrappeur left the room. | 18:24:48 |
| 12 Nov 2021 |
| cole-h | FYI: I'm redeploying ofborg to hopefully integrate the aarch64-darwin builders we recently added. If you notice anything off, please let me know! | 22:03:12 |
 Sandro 🐧 | I noticed that a couple of hours ago it was quite slow | 22:05:15 |
| cole-h | What exactly was slow? Builds? Evaluations? GitHub statuses being pushed to PRs? | 22:06:42 |
| Sandro 🐧 | ofborg starting with anything after the PR was opened for 10 or 20 minutes | 22:07:43 |
| Sandro 🐧 | let me rephrase that: after 10 or 20 minutes ofborg didn't send any status back to the PR
| 22:08:15 |
| cole-h | It's possible that there was just a large volume of PRs (maybe large PRs themselves) taking up all of the evaluators' compute time. | 22:08:35 |
| cole-h | If it happens more frequently, feel free to ping me and I'll take a look | 22:08:55 |
| Sandro 🐧 | yeah, should remember to do that | 22:09:11 |
| cole-h | 
Download image.png | 22:53:20 |
| cole-h | 🎉 | 22:53:23 |
| 13 Nov 2021 |
| Sandro 🐧 | Now we only need more maintainers | 00:27:08 |
| 15 Nov 2021 |
 7c6f434c | Indeed now we get both kinds of Darwin results, thanks! | 15:16:52 |
 hexa | basic release checks are failing for me with line numbers I can't reproduce while the release checks work for me locally. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/142319#issuecomment-969435209 | 23:29:20 |
| hexa | * basic release checks are failing for ofBorg with line numbers I can't reproduce, while the release checks work for me locally. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/142319#issuecomment-969435209 | 23:31:45 |
| cole-h | Basic evaluation checks aren't ofborg | 23:46:17 |
| cole-h | The error occurs after merging the PR into master | 23:53:52 |
| cole-h | If you rebase on master, you'll be able to see the error | 23:54:06 |
| cole-h | 
Download image.png | 23:54:38 |
| 16 Nov 2021 |
| hexa | oh, okay! | 08:26:55 |
