| 3 Nov 2024 |
 Bot_wxt1221 | In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
Idk, using aarch64-linux to eval for aarch64-darwin doesn't feel right lol. Ideally it should evaluate the same but what if it doesn't? * | 23:57:16 |
 Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
It is better to have it than there's no. It should be a bug in nix if we have different result if we evaluate on x86 and darwin. Anyway, if you are really worried about this. We can just run them in qemu. You can't emulate Darwin without breaking the terms | 23:57:31 |
| Tristan Ross | So that's a no | 23:57:38 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
You can't emulate Darwin without breaking the terms I mean aarch64. Sorry for wrong typing | 23:57:53 |
| Tristan Ross | The system name holds both the arch and OS so still that could introduce problems if there is a bug. | 23:58:50 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | How about run a full VM? | 23:59:26 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | Anyway, I don't think we should discuss about a bug which doesn't know if it exist. | 23:59:50 |
| 4 Nov 2024 |
| Tristan Ross | Still can't emulate aarch64-darwin | 00:00:04 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | So could we solve the problem of evaluator? | 00:00:34 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
Anyway, I don't think we should discuss about a bug which doesn't know if it exist. Afaik, @k900:0upti.me has mentioned impurities but idk if that affects the evaluator | 00:00:43 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | Tristan RossRun a full VM will solve it.
| 00:01:22 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | Even though it is really slow, it is better than nothing. | 00:01:48 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
Tristan RossRun a full VM will solve it.
Of aarch64-darwin? | 00:02:35 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
Of aarch64-darwin? I mean evaluate on aarch64-linux | 00:03:02 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
So could we solve the problem of evaluator? Get more aarch64-darwin machines | 00:03:07 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
I mean evaluate on aarch64-linux Ok but if there are impurities problems then that would still cause issues | 00:03:30 |
| Tristan Ross | And emulation isn't the solution | 00:03:44 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | So we can run x86_64-linux VM on aarch64-linux | 00:03:48 |
| Tristan Ross | Too inefficient | 00:03:50 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | It is still better than no. | 00:03:57 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
So we can run x86_64-linux VM on aarch64-linux Why | 00:04:05 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
Why Because you are worried about impurities | 00:04:27 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @bot-wxt1221:matrix.org
Because you are worried about impurities That wouldn't solve the problem still | 00:06:17 |
| Tristan Ross | Emulation isn't efficient | 00:06:36 |
| Tristan Ross | The system should match the hardware | 00:06:54 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | However, it is less efficient if aarch64-linux builder do nothing now. | 00:07:42 |
| Tristan Ross | True but doesn't x86_64-linux also have the same thing of not doing much? | 00:12:03 |
| Tristan Ross | It's hard to assign work to machines which inherently don't support the target. | 00:13:00 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | Redacted or Malformed Event | 00:13:26 |
| Bot_wxt1221 | In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
It's hard to assign work to machines which inherently don't support the target. Does evaluating have something to do with arch? | 00:18:38 |
