| 26 Jul 2024 |
 7c6f434c | It is notable that all three of the PRs touch packages with an empty or unspecified maintainer list | 14:27:14 |
| 7c6f434c | Maybe there are no rev-deps with non-empty maintainer list? | 14:30:52 |
 Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | In reply to @7c6f434c:nitro.chat
It is notable that all three of the PRs touch packages with an empty or unspecified maintainer list Is this a new feature or always is? | 14:31:59 |
| 7c6f434c | I remember that the first version of implicit packages set traversal for Hydra required specifying platforms and (non-empty) maintainers (years ago)… | 14:34:09 |
| 7c6f434c | Hmmm, not sure if that check ends up used by OfBorg, actually | 14:43:50 |
| 7c6f434c | (Also not sure into which package sets it recurses) | 14:44:18 |
 hexa | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
and core.ofborg.org has no AAAA record set up cole-h: please? | 15:16:23 |
 cole-h | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
cole-h: please? Oops sorry I missed that. Added, should see it when DNS propagation decides to do its thing | 15:32:43 |
| 28 Jul 2024 |
 linj | any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 | 13:32:21 |
| linj | nixpkgs-review gives me 0 rebuilds | 13:32:33 |
| linj | * any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 | 13:32:55 |
| Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | In reply to @me:linj.tech
any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 I also saw this in @sigmanificient's PR, which is just cleaning up some unused variables | 13:33:43 |
| Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330312 | 13:35:21 |
 Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311459 | 13:38:27 |
| Artturin | Left a comment | 13:40:06 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | I’ll take a look tomorrow 📈 | 20:54:57 |
|  felixalb joined the room. | 21:42:59 |
 Tristan Ross | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330567 https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/51de36ad23c7e099c946432d2e3120eb weird error and `@ofborg eval` didn't do anything at all. | 21:43:24 |
 Sandro | ofborg can take a bit | 21:49:49 |
| Sandro | or it OOMed | 21:50:00 |
| Tristan Ross | Oh, OOM was my guess | 21:52:28 |
| Tristan Ross | Since it finally updated to say it's reevaluating | 21:52:48 |
| Tristan Ross | And it didn't mention anything | 21:52:54 |
| Tristan Ross | Reevaluating it still failed | 23:48:21 |
| 29 Jul 2024 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | In reply to @artturin:matrix.org
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311459 Proposed fix: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330915 | 18:45:55 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | cc aleksana (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) also | 18:46:07 |
| 31 Jul 2024 |
 ElvishJerricco | we kicked off a build on a staging PR by mistake. Should someone kill that? | 15:35:10 |
| 7 Aug 2024 |
 trofi | Another missing trivial tests eval failure: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/319173#issuecomment-2272875997 | 08:11:08 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | In reply to @trofi:matrix.org
Another missing trivial tests eval failure: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/319173#issuecomment-2272875997 Filed https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/333014 to fix. | 15:06:21 |
| 8 Aug 2024 |
|  Alyssa Ross set a profile picture. | 18:48:54 |
