| 28 Jul 2024 |
linj | any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 | 13:32:21 |
linj | nixpkgs-review gives me 0 rebuilds | 13:32:33 |
linj | * any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 | 13:32:55 |
Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | In reply to @me:linj.tech any ideas why ofborg says there is one changed path x86_64-linux nixpkgs-manual which is not relevant to my PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330632 I also saw this in @sigmanificient's PR, which is just cleaning up some unused variables | 13:33:43 |
Find me at aleksana:qaq.li | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330312 | 13:35:21 |
Artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311459 | 13:38:27 |
Artturin | Left a comment | 13:40:06 |
Philip Taron (UTC-8) | I’ll take a look tomorrow 📈 | 20:54:57 |
| felixalb joined the room. | 21:42:59 |
Tristan Ross | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/330567 https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/51de36ad23c7e099c946432d2e3120eb weird error and `@ofborg eval` didn't do anything at all. | 21:43:24 |
Sandro | ofborg can take a bit | 21:49:49 |