| 31 Dec 2024 |
 Janne Heß | I would have liked to use the outputs of the eval action, but GitHub doesn't return the data I would need | 09:56:01 |
| Janne Heß | I'll see what I can do with that, thank you | 09:56:28 |
 @infinisil:matrix.org | @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de Sorry to throw a bit of a curve ball, but thank you for doing the ofborg migration anyways :)
| 09:57:50 |
| Janne Heß | I mean you basically told me what I should have already known 🤷 never shoot the messenger | 09:58:24 |
| Janne Heß | It's a bit frustrating tbh, but I'll keep going when I have time again (hopefully this year) | 09:58:59 |
| @infinisil:matrix.org | ❤️ | 10:00:04 |
| @infinisil:matrix.org | I'll try to communicate things like this more widely in the future | 10:00:26 |
| Janne Heß | I don't really see this as your fault, the entire thing of ofborg and equinix was a bit chaotic from my perspective. I see this as something that will likely get better once more steering structures are in place | 10:01:29 |
| Janne Heß | * I don't really see this as your fault, the entire thing of ofborg and equinix was a bit chaotic from my perspective. I see this as something that will likely get better in the future once more steering structures are in place | 10:01:39 |
| Janne Heß | infinisil: The actions already checkMeta, right? | 10:28:00 |
| @infinisil:matrix.org | In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
infinisil: The actions already checkMeta, right? Yup | 10:28:44 |
| Janne Heß | Yep, then I can probably remove all nix evals | 10:29:07 |
 7c6f434c | Honestly, it's not just about steering as about administrative, although those are linked | 10:44:04 |
| Janne Heß | In reply to @7c6f434c:nitro.chat
Honestly, it's not just about steering as about administrative, although those are linked I wasn't implying this is the task of any committee or group, rather that communication and organization is a lot easier when it's clear who owns/maintains/manages what which does require some form of structure | 11:12:14 |
| 7c6f434c | I just mean that some of the tasks critical for the improvements you hope for are not yet taken up (some of this is a part of refilling/expanding the foundation board, for example) | 11:17:45 |
| Janne Heß | Yes, I know it's ongoing and hard work and I'm grateful for the people doing it | 11:19:48 |
|  siraben left the room. | 14:51:22 |
 emily | is the current ofborg eval queue size a metric that can be publicly viewed? | 16:38:10 |
 Alyssa Ross | room topic suggests so :) | 16:38:28 |
| emily | whoops | 16:38:38 |
| emily | Element started hiding that behind a click so I never think to check it any more :/ | 16:38:45 |
| emily | thanks | 16:38:52 |
|  phaer changed their display name from phaer (8650 at 38c3) to phaer. | 19:24:28 |
 @adam:robins.wtf | Should we remove the ofborg eval pending check if the build capacity is going offline? I understand it'll be back, but if that's going to be some time it seems cleaner to avoid posting the status at all | 19:28:59 |
| emily | I thought it was being saved at the last minute (but maybe I'm misinformed?) | 20:06:20 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | ahhh that would be news to me | 20:07:34 |
| @adam:robins.wtf | i know Janne has been working on it, but i got the impression there would be a gap of time | 20:07:50 |
| emily | I have no idea at this point :) | 20:16:55 |
| emily | (more worryingly I'm not sure anyone has a certain idea 😅) | 20:17:11 |
| Janne Heß | Oh man | 20:19:33 |
