| 7 Jul 2023 |
 vcunat | We should probably measure the difference in performance on the particular expensive eval ofBorg is doing. Otherwise I don't trust it really. | 17:12:05 |
 cole-h | I'll do so. On 5dd0190da9b5aecb5238c1bea1ebaa77f15c6a45, here are the time stats:
822.67user 14.59system 10:02.16elapsed 139%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 58247012maxresident)k
72088inputs+0outputs (0major+14564664minor)pagefaults 0swaps
| 17:13:06 |
| cole-h | Running 2.4pre20210810_a6ba313 (not an ofborg machine, but same type) | 17:14:08 |
| cole-h | (I already bisected the largest increase in eval time to 4af22aab8e239b1ca28da851755c6da1a35fc91b, which made the leap from ~4-5m to like 7m, but not yet the remaining increase to 10m) | 17:17:20 |
| cole-h | * (I already bisected the largest increase in eval time to 4af22aab8e239b1ca28da851755c6da1a35fc91b, which made the leap from ~4-5m to like 7m, but not yet the remaining increase to 10m) | 17:17:28 |
 Artturin | 2.3.16 and 2.4pre-rc1 have a difference of 3,902 commits https://github.com/NixOS/nix/compare/2.3.16...2.4pre-rc1
| 17:24:14 |
