| 13 Feb 2023 |
 cole-h | No, I screwed something up :) | 21:52:30 |
 Winter (she/her) | * Huh, did it expire or something stupid? | 21:52:32 |
| cole-h | Fix: https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/pull/634
I'll be deploying this tomorrow. | 22:48:14 |
| 15 Feb 2023 |
| Winter (she/her) | cole-h: Would you mind confirming that https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/216231 only had one build attempt per system?
I ask because the author is saying that they could have sworn it succeeded on OfBorg's x86_64-darwin when it timed out (plus, the current derivation fails on Darwin -- there's no chance it actually did succeed even if it didn't time out). Even though I don't think it's actually the case (as the logs site confirms), I just want to be 100% sure. Thank you! | 05:36:54 |
| cole-h | In reply to @winterqt:nixos.dev
cole-h: Would you mind confirming that https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/216231 only had one build attempt per system?
I ask because the author is saying that they could have sworn it succeeded on OfBorg's x86_64-darwin when it timed out (plus, the current derivation fails on Darwin -- there's no chance it actually did succeed even if it didn't time out). Even though I don't think it's actually the case (as the logs site confirms), I just want to be 100% sure. Thank you! Whatever you see on logs.nix.ci is the truth of what happened :P So x86_64-darwin only ever timed out: https://logs.nix.ci/?attempt_id=7e2121db-9d89-4c2b-85a7-8c0dc23fcccd&key=nixos%2Fnixpkgs.216231 | 15:10:52 |
| 17 Feb 2023 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to@cole-h:matrix.org
Whatever you see on logs.nix.ci is the truth of what happened :P So x86_64-darwin only ever timed out: https://logs.nix.ci/?attempt_id=7e2121db-9d89-4c2b-85a7-8c0dc23fcccd&key=nixos%2Fnixpkgs.216231 That's what I thought, thanks. | 02:26:03 |
| 21 Feb 2023 |
|  @yuu:matrix.org joined the room. | 10:27:55 |
| @yuu:matrix.org | is there an issue with ofborg-eval-darwin?
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/GrahamcOfBorg/0f47ada066839a60bf38126e0b4eff14/raw/51b5d34c48a34d8d80e9215f17f30ee1ce835ed4/ofborg-eval-darwin
from https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/217424
| 10:31:12 |
| cole-h | Just looks like it was a networking issue at some point. Couldn't reproduce it locally, so I just told ofborg to re-eval. | 15:10:31 |
| cole-h | (Yeah, re-eval succeeded.) | 15:39:13 |
 Linux Hackerman | Nix expressions or life choices? | 15:39:39 |
| Linux Hackerman | (scnr) | 15:39:41 |
| @yuu:matrix.org left the room. | 23:49:42 |
| 22 Feb 2023 |
 Alyssa Ross | Does OfBorg include broken packages in rebuild counts? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/217591#issuecomment-1440705382 | 19:49:53 |
| cole-h | It's possible: https://github.com/NixOS/ofborg/blob/cf2c6712bd7342406e799110e7cd465aa250cdca/ofborg/src/outpaths.nix#L22 | 19:54:46 |
| Alyssa Ross | Ahhh | 20:09:08 |
| cole-h | I'd have to do more research / testing to know for sure, but I think that would make sense | 20:09:38 |
| Alyssa Ross | I wonder if that should be dropped? AIUI broken doesn't block accessing any attributes, so it shouldn't miss any eval breakages to disallow broken. | 20:09:55 |
| cole-h | It comes from a commit entitled "Support checking meta" -- so maybe a broken package does weird things with meta? | 20:10:55 |
| cole-h | * It was introduced in a commit entitled "Support checking meta" -- so maybe a broken package does weird things with meta? | 20:11:05 |
